首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Your weight affects how long you live—but it’s extremely complicated A) We often think about weight loss in the short term, h
Your weight affects how long you live—but it’s extremely complicated A) We often think about weight loss in the short term, h
admin
2019-04-30
60
问题
Your weight affects how long you live—but it’s extremely complicated
A) We often think about weight loss in the short term, hoping to drop 5 pounds in time for vacation or 10 in time for a wedding. Of course, this kind of yo-yo dieting isn’t the greatest for our health. If you’re going to ask how much you should weigh, you want to think long term—what weight will keep you healthy?
B) This question has been at the forefront of researchers’ minds for a while, and for good reason. Global obesity rates are high and steadily increasing, with 1.3 billion adults considered overweight and 600 million in the weight range categorized as obese.
C) While it’s true that muscle weighs more than fat, most people who are carrying around a few extra pounds are doing so in the form of adipose (脂肪的) tissue. Unlike bone and muscle, fat cells can generate inflammation (炎症), allowing us to heal infections and protect our bodies from further damage. But having too many fat cells causes our bodies to release inflammatory proteins all the time. Many studies indicate this can increase our risk of developing cancer.
D) Carrying around extra fat cells also affects other physiological pathways, many of which—high blood pressure, hyperglycemia (高血糖症) , and high cholesterol, for example—can lead to potentially fatal heart problems.
E) We all need some amount of body fat. So how much is too much? Using BMI (body mass index, the body mass divided by the square of the body height) and rates of overall mortality, scientists studying this question initially came to a surprising conclusion: On a population level, the relationship between BMI and mortality formed a U-shaped curve, in which the lowest point (the one where mortality was at its lowest) was actually at a BMI range considered nearly overweight (about 24.5, when 25 is overweight). Bring on all the healthy fats and carbs (含碳水化合物的食物).
F) But some scientists—including Andrew Stokes, a chronic disease and global health researcher at Boston University—challenged those conclusions. Instead of a U-shaped curve, his group’s follow-up studies saw the risk of mortality increase with higher BMIs. The lowest risk category, he says, is somewhere in the low-normal weight range, and risk increases pretty consistently as BMI goes up.
G) The earlier studies failed to account for two important factors, according to Stokes. "The normal weight category used in most of the studies combines low-risk, stable weight people with high-risk individuals who have lost weight," he says. If a study subject spends most of his life obese and then loses weight, he might accumulate years of negative health effects. Not all of those risks disappear with weight loss. "Much of the research on obesity just uses a snapshot (简要描述) of weight currently," says Stokes.
H) Stokes equates this to the way we study smoking. You can’t simply compare non-smokers to smokers. Non-smokers include those who have never smoked as well as those who may have smoked for several decades and then quit.
I) And smoking itself is another crucial factor in these BMI studies, Stokes says. Smoking can present a huge bias in estimating risks associated with obesity, because the habit affects body weight through metabolic effects and reduced appetite. By failing to take smoking into account, your analysis may include people who have a low body weight but smoke heavily, upping their chance of an early death. Once those outliers are removed, Stokes and his colleagues argue, the relationship between excess body weight and early mortality is clear.
J) Of course, the range for normal BMI is pretty broad. For example, someone who is 5’4" has a normal BMI if they weigh anywhere from 108 pounds to 145 pounds. If we want to know which sliver of the range is actually best, Stokes says, researchers have a lot more work to do.
K) And then there’s the question of whether BMI is the right metric to use at all. BMI is often criticized as a poor indicator of health. Because muscle weighs more than fat, a weightlifter could have a BMI in the overweight range, and that’s to say nothing of all the other variations the human form can take. Even two folks with the same BMI and the same amount of actual body fat might face different risks due to their adipose, if one carries more in their belly and the other stores more in their hips. Studies that compare BMI to superior methods like the Dexa scan, a type of X-ray that can determine exactly how much body fat you have and where, show that the potential misclassification is not trivial. But Stokes argues that on a population level, BMI is a pretty good parameter to use. Variations in its accuracy do exist, but it’s not so wildly off-base as to be useless when we make generalizations about risks throughout an entire population.
L) But that’s the key here: We’re talking about average risk. None of this is to say that someone with an ideal BMI is bound to outlive someone who is obese. There are plenty of other factors at play in determining our health, including genetics, exercise, diet, and especially stress. The degree of fat we carry often intertwines with these other characteristics, but it’s still only one factor. An individual’s health can’t be determined by a number on a scale, and one should always talk to a doctor when considering major lifestyle changes.
M) Still, while there’s no scientific consensus on what range of normal BMI equates to lowest overall mortality, Stokes hazards a guess for the lower end, perhaps 20 to 22. He also points out that many studies (on rodents and primates, anyway) show calorie restriction can increase longevity. One population he thinks we should study more are those humans who have always had a very low BMI. Ping-ponging your weight around to try to get on the lowest possible end of the healthy threshold is definitely not a good idea, but living your entire life with a BMI on the lower end—maybe even under 20—could decrease risk of diseases like cancer and diabetes. It’s an important question, Stokes says, and one that not enough researchers are asking.
What weight we should have to keep fit in the long term is a significant question we should think about.
选项
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/GGX7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Toseeifhaircoloraffectsaperson’schancesofgettingajob,researchersatCaliforniaStateUniversityasked136colleges
Adultsaregettingsmarteraboutbowsmartbabiesare.Notlongago,researcherslearnedthat4-day-oldscouldunderstand【B1】__
A、Around40%.B、Slightlyover50%.C、About15%.D、Approximately70%.B对话中女士明确提到她认为男性黑人运动员的毕业率仅超过一半,而男士随即认同了这个说法。B项中的Slightly对应录音
A、Itshouldbethesameastheonestheyhadbefore.B、Itshouldbedifferentfromtheonestheyhadbefore.C、Itshouldbeexpe
ThePublicHealthCrisisHidinginOurFood[A]Ifyouhavehighbloodpressure,you’reingoodcompany.Hypertension(高血压)affl
Employersarefarlesslikelytoemploypeoplewithmentalillnessesthanthosewithphysicalailments(疾病),areportshows.The
A、30.B、13.C、300.D、12,000.00A短文中讲到,在西雅图市中心,大约有30家星巴克的店。故远A。
A、Heisadirectorinthecompany.B、Heisunqualifiedforhisjob.C、Heisthemanager’sclosefriend.D、Heisarelativeofth
Itwasgoingtohaveroughlytheeffectofaneutronbombattackonhighstreetsandshoppingmalls.Thebuildingswouldbeleft
A、Itwillaffectourphysicalhealth.B、Itwillaffectourpsychosocialhealth.C、Itwillmakeourlivesworse.D、Itwillmakeu
随机试题
A.右心室容量负荷过重B.心脏舒张受限C.左心室容量负荷过重D.右心室压力负荷过重E.机械性肺淤血状态下列病例发生心力衰竭时属于哪项病理生理机制女,30岁。原有风心病重度二尖瓣狭窄,因与人争吵,突发气急,咳嗽,咳粉红色泡沫样痰,大汗淋漓,入院
在施工进度控制过程中,如果由于承包单位自身原因造成工期拖延且不按指令改变延期状态时,则监理工程师不可以采用()手段进行处理。
某水利枢纽工程有混凝土重力坝、水电站等建筑物构成。施工单位与项目法人签订了其中某坝段的施工承包合同,部分合同条款如下:(1)合同总金额15000万元整;开工日期为2007年9月20日,总工期为26个月。(2)开工前项目法人向施工单位支付10%的工程预
电算化会计核算流程与手工会计核算流程基本相同。()
在人寿保险客户服务中,( )的业务量最大。
我国反垄断法律制度禁止具有市场支配地位的经营者,无正当理由限定交易相对人只能与其进行交易或者只能与其指定的经营者进行交易。下列各项中,属于法定正当理由的有()。
在贯彻“教育引导发展的原则”时,应该注意什么?
幼儿园教师了解幼儿的最主要目的是()
“三个有利于”标准具有内在的联系,其中最基本的是人民生活水平的改善。()
一种确定物种起源的方法是比较有亲缘关系的物种的遗传物质。科学家们认为两个物种的遗传物质越是相似,它们从同一祖先分化出来的时间距今就越近。在比较了大熊猫、棕熊猫、浣熊、长鼻浣熊和所有七种熊的遗传物质之后,科学家们发现:熊类和浣熊是在距今3000万至500
最新回复
(
0
)