首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
admin
2012-01-14
78
问题
Whose Grave Is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A) [■] When Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.
(B) [■] The tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.
(C) [■] Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.
(D) [■] There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable? From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance. Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself. Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come (while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves). The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up. In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
Which of the following can be inferred from Paragraph 4 about the power of the curse of the Pharaoh’s tomb?
选项
A、It is supported by science.
B、It is a rumor denied by scientific fact.
C、It is still a myth.
D、It does punish people who disturb the tomb.
答案
B
解析
本题为推论题。题目问:关于第四段所提到的诅咒的力量,可以作出以下哪一项推论?根据本段,Carter团队中的一些人的意外死亡似乎应验了这一诅咒,但是Carter却在多年以后平静地去世。所以,这证明了谣言并不正确,已经被事实所否定,因此选B项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/GFyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
CompletethesentencesbelowwithNOMORETHANONEWORDfromthepassage.Writeyouranswersinboxes7-9onyouranswersheet.
Lookatthefollowingstatements(Questions4-10)andthelistofpeoplebelow.Matcheachstatementwiththecorrectperson,A-F.
Choosethecorrectletter,A,B,CorD.Writethecorrectletterinboxesonyouranswersheet.Accordingtothepassage,iti
SECTION1Questions1-10Questions1-3Listentothetelephoneconversationbetweenastudentandtheownerofaparaglidings
【1】Whatistotheleftofthelostpropertyoffice?
TheprofessoralreadyknowssomethingaboutClarefromher______.
GoalSettingSetan(17)goal.Decideonincentives.(18)stepsalongtheway.Gather(19).Takethe
CompletethenotesinNOMORETHANTHREEWORDS.ThesubjectstakenInthefirstsemesterinthiscoursearepsychology,sociolog
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSAND/ORANUMBERforeachanswer.SCHEDULEOFACTIONRead’Approache
NarratorListentoapartofalectureinanecologyclass.WhatistheHydrologiccycle?
随机试题
根据《环评法》规定,规划环评文件的受理机关是()
证券市场的价格反映了所有公开发表的信息称为()
符合神经组织再生的描述是
在下列药物中,属于钙拮抗剂类抗心绞痛药的是
关于涉外民事诉讼,下列哪一选项是不正确的?()
某变电所中的一台500/220/35kV,容量为750/750/250MVA的三相自耦变压器,联接方式为YNad11,变压器采用了零序差动保护,用于零序差动保护的高、中压及中性点电流互感器的变比应分别选下列哪一组:
融资租赁按其业务内容的不同特点可分为()。
人体对外界环境刺激产生适应的能力是实现可训练性的生理基础。()
实验发现少量口服某种安定物,可使人们在测谎的测验中撒谎而不被发现。测谎所产生的心理压力能够被这类安定药物有效地抑制,同时没有显著的副作用。因此,这类药物可同时有效地减少日常生活的心理压力而无显著的副作用。以下哪项最可能是题干的论证所假设的?
下列不能打开属性窗口的操作是______。
最新回复
(
0
)