首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
75
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
The following things about the railroads aroused public resentment EXCEPT ______ .
选项
A、their political power
B、high fares
C、the economic loss
D、their indifference toward individuals
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在文章的结尾段,讲述了人们对这类案件态度的改变,以及造成态度转变的因素。A、B、D三项均符合文意,只有C项文中未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/FQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
(1)TheTerm"CYBERSPACE"wascoinedbyWilliamGibson,ascience-fictionwriter.Hefirstuseditinashortstoryin1982,and
FourreasonsthatrosyNovemberjobsreportwasevenbetterthanitseemed.It’simportantnottomaketoomuchoutofasingle
FRANKFURT—IbumpeddowninFrankfurtat10:55AM.AGermanlanding,Ithought—unsubtleandpunctual.Theskywasclear,anun
A、15LonkonStreet,Annandale.B、50LonkonStreet,Annandale.C、51LonkonStreet,Annandale.D、15LondonStreet,Annandale.A管理员
A、ImpactoffarmingtechnologyonIndustrialRevolution.B、Technologyusedinmodernfarmingmethod.C、Inventionsmadeinthe19
Excessivecaloriesfromsugarcancontributetoweightproblems,andsugarisalsowellknownforitsabilitytopromoteteethd
Recentyearshaveseenanincreasingnumberofchildrenbecomingthevictimsofabuse.Fortunately,educationonsexsafetyisn
(1)Thishasbeenquiteaweekforliterarycoups.Inanalmostentirelyunexpectedmove,theSwedishAcademyhavethislunchtim
(1)Themoreresponsibilityyoutakeonatworkandinlife,themoreoftenyoufacegray-areaproblems.Thesearesituations
Onlytoday______knowntopublic.
随机试题
关于产程分期,下述正确的是
畸形舌侧窝的好发牙齿是
基金资产估值须考虑的因素有()。
下列不属于社会公益活动的项目是()
单位可以成为行贿罪的主体。()
【2012年吉林省第10题】实验中学初中部三年级有四个班级,本学期末要评选三好学生,名额分配关系如下:三年级一班、二班、三班评选出32名三好学生,三年级二班、三班、四班评选出28名三好学生,并且三年级一班和四班的三好学生总数是三年级二班和三班三好学生总数的
设X1,X2,X3,X4为来自总体N(1,0.2)(σ>0)的简单随机样本,则统计量的分布为
微分方程x2y"一2xy’+2y+=x+4的通解为___________.
信息产业部电子教育与考试中心(全国电子信息应用教育中心)在其网站开通计算机技术与软件专业技术资格(水平)证书查询服务,属于(39)模式。
有以下通用过程:Functionfun(NAsInteger)s=0Fork=1ToNs=s+k*(k+1)Nextkfun=sEndFunction该过程的功能是
最新回复
(
0
)