首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
95
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
The following things about the railroads aroused public resentment EXCEPT ______ .
选项
A、their political power
B、high fares
C、the economic loss
D、their indifference toward individuals
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在文章的结尾段,讲述了人们对这类案件态度的改变,以及造成态度转变的因素。A、B、D三项均符合文意,只有C项文中未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/FQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Theabilitytocommunicateistheprimaryfactorthatdistinguisheshumanbeingsfromanimals.Anditistheabilitytocommunic
(1)Onceagain,seething,residualangerhasburstforthinanAmericancity.AndtheriotsthatovertookLosAngeleswerearemi
GymCrazeI.ThegymcrazebecomesChinese【T1】______.【T1】______A.asignof【T2】______.【T2】______B.gym-goersinclude:-
Populationageingandtheresultingpressuresonexistingpensionsystemsconstitutesoneofthemostimportantchallengesmode
Tobecalledbeautifulisthoughttonamesomethingessentialtowomen’scharacterandconcerns.(Incontrastbymen—whoseessen
Tobecalledbeautifulisthoughttonamesomethingessentialtowomen’scharacterandconcerns.(Incontrastbymen—whoseessen
A、ItwasentirelyprovidedbytheTreasurerandtheCabinet.B、Itwassupportedbyenterprisesandcompanies.C、Littlewasalloc
PassageFourWhateffectdoestheironfrombloodcellshaveaccordingtotheresearcher’sexperiment?
Iamused______byairandonlyononeoccasionhaveIeverfeltfrightened.
TheMainLibraryhasfivefloorsopentothepublic. FOURTHFLOOR:SocialSciences&History.300-399,650-
随机试题
资产评估报告一般由()使用。
下列何种病变不见于肾急性血管型排斥反应
护士执业注册的有效期为
根据《标准施工合同》的规定,履约担保和预付款担保的主要区别有()。
某矿井井底车场主要巷道的施工网络计划如图所示,图中箭线下方数据为工作时间,单位为月。施工中,工作E由于业主修改设计,使其耽误工期2个月,为维持原工期不变,经业主同意,施工单位增开了一辅助巷道,安排在D工作后面,G、H工作前面,工作名称L,时间1个月,可使工
甲公司与乙厂签订一份服装订购合同。约定由甲公司在5月份先支付乙厂预付款100万元,再由乙厂在8月份向甲公司提供西服2000套。订立合同后甲公司以资金周转困难为由,没有按期支付预付款。到了8月份,甲公司要求乙厂提供西服时,乙厂可以行使()。
简述菲利普斯曲线的主要内容。
甲、乙两地点之间有三条道路相连。某地理活动小组测绘了这三条道路的纵向剖面图(图3)。若使用大型运输车从乙地运送重型机械设备至甲地,最适合行车的是()。
特别提款权的创立是()
依次执行以下命令后的输出结果是()。SETDATETOYMDSETCENTURYONSETCENTURYTO19ROLLOVER10SETMARKTO"."?.CTOD("4
最新回复
(
0
)