首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
76
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______.
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published’
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/ErlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Theuniversityhaslaunchedaresearchcentertodevelopnewwaysof______bacteriawhichhavebecomeresistanttodrugtreatme
Aspointedoutatthebeginningofthepassage,peopleusedtothinkthatairpollution______.Theunderlinedword"offset"in
Washington’steapotismorevaluableasantiquesbecause______.Inpractice,whichofthefollowingisthemostimportantfeat
Thisletterwaswrittenby______.Themanlosthisjobbecause______.
Globalsatellitecommunicationssystemswillbeusefulto______.Whatcanwesayaboutthenewglobalsatellitecommunications
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorrespo
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowaridcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorres
Howcanwegetridofgarbage?Dowehaveenoughenergysourcestomeetourfutureenergyneeds?Thesearetwoimportantque
EveryoneusestheexpressionsAMandPM.Butdoyouexactlyknowwhattheymeanandhowtheycameintobeing?Asyouknow,t
Crimehasitsowncycles,amagazinereportedsomeyearsago.Policerecordsthatwerestudiedforfiveyearsfromover2,400ci
随机试题
氢氯噻嗪常用于治疗________和________。
属于交界性肿瘤的是
A.PCAB.血清胃泌素C.cagAD.IFAE.13CP乎气实验慢性胃炎伴胃酸分泌减少时检查可增高的是
A.发热、全身不适、头痛、厌食、恶心、肌痛、关节痛和淋巴结肿大,类似血清病的症状。此时血液中可检出HIV及P24抗原。一般症状持续3~14d后自然消失B.CD4+T淋巴细胞明显减少和并发严重机会性感染,但通过各种检查没有发现HIV-1或HIV-2感染
SIgA
我国《刑法》第6条规定:“凡在中华人民共和国领域内犯罪的,除法律有特别规定的以外,都适用本法。”这里的“特别规定”,是指:()。
某拟建水利枢纽工程为坝后式开发。工程以防洪为主,兼顾供水和发电。水库具有年调节性能,坝址断面多年平均流量88.7m2/s。运行期电站至少有一台机组按额定容量的45%带基荷运行,可确保连续下泄流量不小于5m3/s。工程永久占地80hm2,临时占地1
已确认为坏账的应收账款,意味着企业放弃了其追索权。()
某公司只生产和销售两种产品,假设该公司两种产品的财务和成本数据如下:公司管理会计师划分了下列作业、间接成本集合及成本动因:两种产品的实际作业量如下:要求:采用作业基础成本计算制度,确定两种产品的单位盈利能力。
在通货膨胀中,最大利益受损者主要包括()。
最新回复
(
0
)