首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
60
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______.
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published’
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/ErlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
【B1】【B20】
【B1】【B18】
Shepulledawayfromthewindow______anyoneshouldseethem.
Thatcountryhasfallenbehindothercountries(inmanufactureofcheapcottongoods).
Everycitizeninademocraticcountrymay______theprotectionofthelaw.
Thefootballmatchwastelevised_____fromtheBeijingOlympicStadium.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowaridcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorres
Howcanwegetridofgarbage?Dowehaveenoughenergysourcestomeetourfutureenergyneeds?Thesearetwoimportantque
(79)TheOlympicGamesareheldeveryfouryearsinadifferentcityintheworld.Athletesfrommanycountriescompeteinavari
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
随机试题
_______的建立是我国金融系统建立金融最高认证权威的第一步。()
采用波分复用(WDM)技术的主要目的是()。
下列焊接检验方法中,不属于非破坏性试验的是()。
下列各项中,属于促销组合构成要素的有()。
教育心理学作为一门独立的学科,从20世纪60年代到70年代末为()。
材料(大意):材料一:一个外国留学生在法国时去某公司应聘被拒绝,原因是他有三次坐公交车逃票的经历被记录在案。材料二:今年“两会”期间,有政协委员提议应该给每个公民建立一份道德档案,以此来约束大家,让每个人都要“知耻”。材料三:
宏命令OpenBeport的功能是
Youwillhearanotherfiverecordings.Foreachrecording,decidewhoistalking.Writeoneletter(A-H)nexttothenumberoft
Amsterdam,atriumphofresourcefulness,isthebiggestcityintheNetherlands.Spaceisrareand【B1】______inAmsterdam,where
A、Classmates.B、Colleagues.C、Bossandsecretary.D、PRrepresentativeandclient.B录音提到,John和Sue加入了一家成功的publicrelation公司。由此可知他们
最新回复
(
0
)