首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Accidental Scientists A A paradox lies close to the heart of scientific discovery. If you know just what you are looking for, fi
Accidental Scientists A A paradox lies close to the heart of scientific discovery. If you know just what you are looking for, fi
admin
2018-09-11
91
问题
Accidental Scientists
A A paradox lies close to the heart of scientific discovery. If you know just what you are looking for, finding it can hardly count as a discovery, since it was fully anticipated. But if, on the other hand, you have no notion of what you are looking for, you cannot know when you have found it, and discovery, as such, is out of the question. In the philosophy of science, these extremes map onto the purist forms of deductivism and inductivism: In the former, the outcome is supposed to be logically contained in the premises you start with; in the latter, you are recommended to start with no expectations whatsoever and see what turns up.
B As in so many things, the ideal position is widely supposed to reside somewhere in between these two impossible-to-realise extremes. You want to have a good enough idea of what you are looking for to be surprised when you find something else of value, and you want to be ignorant enough of your end point that you can entertain alternative outcomes. Scientific discovery should, therefore, have an accidental aspect, but not too much of one. Serendipity is a word that expresses a position something like that. It’s a fascinating word, and the late .Robert King Merton—"the father of the sociology of science"—liked it well enough to compose its biography, assisted by the French cultural historian Elinor Barber.
C The word did not appear in the published literature until the early 19th century and did not become well enough known to use without explanation until sometime in the first third of the 20th century. Serendipity means a "happy accident" or "pleasant surprise", specifically, the accident of finding something good or useful without looking for it. The first noted use of "serendipity" in the English language was by Horace Walpole. He explained that it came from the fairy tale, called The Three Princes of Serendip(the ancient name for Ceylon, or present day Sri Lanka), whose heroes "were always making discoveries, by accidents and sagacity, of things which they were not in quest of.
D Antiquarians, following Walpole, found use for it, as they were always rummaging about for curiosities, and unexpected but pleasant surprises were not unknown to them. Some people just seemed to have a knack for that sort of thing, and serendipity was used to express that special capacity. The other community that came to dwell on serendipity to say something important about their practice was that of scientists, and here usages cut to the heart of the matter and were often vigorously contested. Many scientists, including the Harvard physiologist Walter Cannon and, later, the British immunologist Peter Medawar, liked to emphasise how much of scientific discovery was unplanned and even accidental. One of the examples is Hans Christian
rsted’s discovery of electromagnetism when he unintentionally brought a current-carrying wire parallel to a magnetic needle. Rhetoric about the sufficiency of rational method was so much hot air. Indeed, as Medawar insisted, "There is no such thing as The Scientific Method," no way at all of systematis-ing the process of discovery. Really important discoveries had a way of showing up when they had a mind to do so and not when you were looking for them. Maybe some scientists, like some book collectors, had a happy knack; maybe serendipity described the situation rather than a personal skill or capacity.
E Some scientists using the word meant to stress those accidents belonging to the situation; some treated serendipity as a personal capacity; many others exploited the ambiguity of the notion. Yet what Cannon and Medawar took as a benign nose-thumbing at Dreams of Method, other scientists found incendiary. To say that science had a significant serendipitous aspect was taken by some as dangerous denigration. If scientific discovery were really accidental, then what was the special basis of expert authority? In this connection, the aphorism of choice came from no less an authority on scientific discovery than Louis Pasteur: "Chance favors the prepared mind." Accidents may happen, and things may turn up unplanned and unforeseen, as one is looking for something else, but the ability to notice such events, to see their potential bearing and meaning, to exploit their occurrence and make constructive use of them—these are the results of systematic mental preparation. What seems like an accident is just another form of expertise. On closer inspection, it is insisted, accident dissolves into sagacity.
F The context in which scientific serendipity was most contested and had its greatest resonance was that connected with the idea of planned science. The serendipitists were not all inhabitants of academic ivory towers. As Merton and Barber note, two of the great early-20th-century American pioneers of industrial research—Willis Whitney and Irving Langmuir, both of General Electric—made much play of serendipity, in the course of arguing against overly rigid research planning. Langmuir thought that misconceptions about the certainty and rationality of the research process did much harm and that a mature acceptance of uncertainty was far more likely to result in productive research policies. For his own part, Langmuir said that satisfactory outcomes "occurred as though we were just drifting with the wind. These things came about by accident." If there is no very determinate relationship between cause and effect in research, he said, "men planning does not get us very far." So, from within the bowels of corporate capitalism came powerful arguments, by way of serendipity, for scientific spontaneity and autonomy. The notion that industry was invariably committed to the regimentation of scientific research just doesn’t wash.
G For Merton himself—who one supposes must have been the senior author—serendipity represented the keystone in the arch of his social scientific work. In 1936, as a very young man, Merton wrote a seminal essay on "The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action." It is, he argued, the nature of social action that what one intends is rarely what one gets: Intending to provide resources for buttressing Christian religion, the natural philosophers of the Scientific Revolution laid the groundwork for secularism; people wanting to be alone with nature in Yosemite Valley wind up crowding one another. We just don’t know enough—and we can never know enoughs—to ensure that the past is an adequate guide to the future: Uncertainty about outcomes, even of our best-laid plans, is endemic. All social action, including that undertaken with the best evidence and formulated according to the most rational criteria, is uncertain in its consequences.
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 on the following pages.
Questions 27-32
Reading Passage 3 has seven paragraphs, A-G.
Choose the most suitable heading for paragraphs A-G from the list of headings below.
Write the appropriate number, i-x, in boxes 27-32 on your answer sheet.
List of Headings
i Examples of some scientific discoveries
ii Horace Walpole’s fairy tale
iii Resolving the contradiction
iv What is the Scientific Method
v The contradiction of views on scientific discovery
vi Some misunderstandings of serendipity
vii Opponents of authority
viii Reality doesn’t always match expectation
ix How the word came into being
x Illustration of serendipity in the business sector
Example Answer
Paragraph B iii
Paragraph A
选项
答案
v
解析
该段落主要介绍了科学发现的两种方式“deductivism”和“inductivism”,同时段落中有多处提及两者之间的对立(contradiction)关系,从开始的“paradox”、“…on the other hand”到后来的“these extremes”等。与该段落相关的标题只有iii.Resolving the contradiction和v.The contradiction of views on scientific discovery。但iii并没有提及解决问题(Resolving)的相关内容,而且iii还是段落B的对应标题,理应排除,所以正确答案为v.
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/EONO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
PRODIGIOUS:PERSON::
Whiletheambitiontodrawanimmediateconclusionis______,itisnotnecessarilycorrect,forthesearchforthetruthdepends
Scientistshavelongspeculatedastotheextentthatinbreedingcontributestothedeclineandeventualextinctionofla
Relativismamountstothedenialofanobjectiveworldaboutwhichtrueandfalsestatementscanbemade;thereisnoabs
Toaperson______naturalhistory,hiscoun-tryorseasidestrollisawalkt,hroughagalleryfilledwithwonderfulworksofart
(Thispassagewaswrittenpriorto1950)Wenowknowthatwhatconstitutespracticallyallofmatterisemptyspa
Howisanewbornstarformed?Fortheanswertothisquestion,wemustlooktothefamiliarphysicalconceptofgravitat
Accordingtocolorpsychologists,certainhuestendtoreflectparticularpersonality______;violet,forexample,indicatesate
ThetoneofJaneCarlyle’sletterisguarded,andherfeelingsarealways(i)____bythewitandpridethatmade(ii)____pleaf
In1755BritishwriterSamuelJohnsonpublishedanacerbiclettertoLordChesterfieldrebukinghispatronforneglectanddecli
随机试题
人的行为的基本构成要素有行为主体、行为客体、行为环境、行为手段和
既有法人融资项目,负债由()承担。
对现金进行清查的方法应是( )。
会计人员继续教育中的会计职业道德教育,具体应包括()。
《普通高中化学课程标准(实验)》中指出:重视探究学习活动,发展学生的科学探究能力。探究学习是学生学习化学的一种重要方式,也是培养学生探究意识和提高探究能力的重要途径。根据材料,请回答下列问题:探究教学的基本原则有哪些?
对于因民间纠纷引起的打架斗殴或者损毁他人财物等违反治安管理行为,情节较轻的,公安机关可以调解处理。经公安机关调解,当事人达成协议的,()
阅读下面这篇公文。回答下列问题。关于外国航空公司未报送航空运输业务量统计资料的情况①各外国航空公司驻中国办事处:为促进外国航空运输企业(以下简称“外航”)在中国航空运输业的统计工作,民航局发展规划司及运输
20世纪90年代,我国秦山、大亚湾核电站相继建成。核电站采用的是核能技术中的核聚变技术。()
Thereasongivenforouracceptanceofagangster’sdownfallisourbeingconvincedthat______.Violenceinmodernsocietiesi
TheUnitedStatesiscomposedoffiftystates,twoof______areseparatedfromtheothersbylandorwater.
最新回复
(
0
)