首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2020-03-30
64
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/D6TO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Forsometimepastithasbeenwidelyacceptedthatbabies—andothercreatures—learntodothingsbecausecertainactsleadto
Theoldmusiciandecidedtomovetohercountryhome______heradvancedageandpoorhealth.
SinceJapan______importancetoeducationandtechnologicalinnovation,itseconomyhasdevelopedatahighspeed.
AlthoughthisbookclaimstobeabiographyofGeorgeWashington,manyoftheincidentsareimaginary.
"ItwasthebeginningofarevolutioninAmericaandtheworld,arevolutionthatsomehaveyettoacknowledgeandmanyhaveyet
Ourmanagerisso______inhisthinking,heneverlistenstonewideas.
Linguistshaveunderstoodfordecadesthatlanguageandthoughtarecloselyrelated.Humansconstructrealityusingthoughtand
LawyerhaveaterriblehabitofusingLatinandindustry______tomystifypeopleandthemselvesmorevaluable.(2002年复旦大学考博试题)
ParticipantsintheShanghaiCo-operationForum______regionalteamworktopromoteinvestmentandeconomicdevelopment.(2003年中国人民
Shefeltoffendedatmyremarks,butitwasn’tmy______tohurther.(2002年武汉大学考博试题)
随机试题
[*]
重度二尖瓣狭窄主动脉瓣关闭不全
含有1个手性碳的1,4-二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂,用于高血压治疗的药物()。
北京某大型股份有限公司,成立以来连续盈利,为了进行更大规模的生产,扩大公司资本,公司经批准向社会发行了股票。该公司的下列行为中不符合《公司法》规定的是()。
什么是旅游保险合同?旅游保险合同具有哪些特点?
在指导儿童结构游戏时,要求大班幼儿学会的结构知识是()
暖和:炎热()
企业的特征包括()。
政治家:没有人可以否认无家可归是一个问题,然而怎样解决它,好像并没共识。可是,有一件事情很明显:忽视这个问题并不会使这个问题远离我们。当且仅当政府插手,给无家可归者提供住房时,这个问题方会消失。而这样做又会迫使政府增加税收。凶此,我们应当增加税收。下面哪.
马医生发现,在进行手术前喝高浓度加蜂蜜的热参茶可以使他手术时主刀更稳,同时更短,效果更好。因此,他认为,要么是参,要么是蜂蜜,含有的某些化学成分能帮助他更快更好地进行手术。以下哪项如果为真,能削弱马医生的上述结论?Ⅰ.马医生在喝含高浓度加蜂蜜的热柠檬茶
最新回复
(
0
)