首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
admin
2013-05-29
49
问题
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this work most ethically. We concluded that it is vitally important for everyone, scientists and consumers alike, to remain alert to the ethical issues we may face as the world becomes filled with embedded, invisible computers.
Computer chips have been inserted into everyday objects since the earliest days of the microprocessor. Today, an average home might have 40 chips in various devices, from remote controls to alarm clocks to wristwatches. This fact has raised few new ethical issues. But as computers become more and more ubiquitous, and less visually obvious, three questions arise. Firstly, will these chips thinking for us make us forget how to think for ourselves? Secondly, will an "information underclass" without access to these devices be created? And thirdly, will these chips invade our privacy?
The goal of ubiquitous computing is to make technology invisible and, by embedding computers into everyday things, make the things themselves smarter. But will this lead to dumber people with less control over their technology? Automobiles, for example, use embedded computers for a host of functions that improve their performance and reliability. But fewer people now know enough about their car to be their own mechanic. Should this loss of a once common skill concern us? I think not. Ever since the first pre-human shaped a stone into an axe, we have been improving our technology. The invention of the axe did represent a loss of control, because some people were better at making axes than others. But the axe also made life easier, so we had more time to develop other skills, like agriculture, art and writing. As another step along this continuum of invention, ubiquitous computing won’t make people dumber; it will give them time to get smart about other things.
I believe, however, that everyone should be given an equal opportunity to get smart about other things. In this regard, there is legitimate concern that the new ubiquitous computers won’t be equally available to everyone, thus driving a wedge between high-tech "haves" and "have-nots". But it is important to realize that the prime mover behind the latest technology is not the technology itself, but an agreement—the Internet.
Agreeing on low computers should talk to one another on the internet has tremendous advantages for exchanging information, decreasing the cost of technology and creating new market opportunities. If all chips are able to relate to each other, then information can be shared cheaply. This means that Internet access may eventually cost only a dollar or two. If the trend towards ever cheaper, more widespread access to information continues, there will be no information underclass.
Ubiquitous computing will make our lives more convenient, but it will also allow computers to know everything about us. Private actions, such as reading the newspaper, may be shared with other computers—and their owners—all over the world. When computers know so much, whom will they tell?
If a computer runs your toaster, for example, it knows when you make toast, and how many slices. By correlating toast-making activity with the license plate numbers of cars parked in front of your house, a computer could determine if a guest had spent the night. But if you were a married politician, and even if you were not, your might want to keep this information secret.
Democracy is based on the principle that if people have enough information, wise decisions will be made. In an age in which embedded computers will provide us with ever more information, it is vital that the ethical implications of this new technology be openly debated. With a little vigilance and planning, we can reap the benefits of this new technology without compromising our intelligence, our opportunities or our freedom.
While discussing whether information will be widely available in the long run, the author centers his analysis on matters of ______.
选项
A、cost
B、human nature
C、intellectual property rights
D、mass media
答案
A
解析
文中第五段在谈到电脑前景时,作者的论述都是围绕“降低成本”(decreasing the cost of technology)展开,因此A为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/BzHO777K
0
研究生英语学位课统考(GET)
相关试题推荐
For150yearsscientistshavetriedtodeterminethesolarconstant,theamountofsolarconstantenergythatreachestheEarth.
Attheendofeverychapterinoursciencetext,thereisagroupof______questions,intendedforstudentswhowishtogomored
Hardly______thetrain______whenthewaitingcrowdrantowardsit.
Howmuchpaindoanimalsfeel?Thisisaquestionwhichhascausedendlesscontroversy.Opponentsofbiggameshooting,forexam
Youmayhavewonderedwhythesupermarketsareallthesame.Itisnotbecausethecompaniesthatoperatethemlackimagination.
Sexprejudicesarebasedonandjustifiedbytheideologythatbiologyisdestiny.Accordingtothisideology,basicbiological
Tousitseemssonaturaltoputupanumbrellatokeepthewateroffwhenitrains.Butactuallytheumbrellawasnotinvented
Tousitseemssonaturaltoputupanumbrellatokeepthewateroffwhenitrains.Butactuallytheumbrellawasnotinvented
Myfatherwasanuclearengineer,averyacademically______manwithmultipledegreesfromprestigiousinstitutions.
随机试题
从众行为
生物碱最常用的沉淀反应试剂是
基本生命支持的内容是
死亡10人以上、29人以下,或直接经济损失100万元以上、不满300万元为()级工程质量重大事故。
钢梁采用高强螺栓连接时,施拧顺序从板束()处开始。
下列不是空调系统管理工作主要内容的是()。
以下属于情境性学习的具体特征的是()。
爱尔兰有大片泥煤蕴藏量丰富的湿地。环境保护主义者一直反对在湿地区域采煤。他们的理由是开采泥煤会破坏爱尔兰湿地的生态平衡,其直接严重后果是会污染水源。然而,这一担心是站不住脚的。据近50年的相关统计,从未发现过因采煤而污染水源的报告。以下哪项如果为真,最能加
评估和选择最佳系统设计方案时,甲认为可以采用点值评估方法,即根据每一个价值因素的重要性,综合打分来选择最佳的方案。乙根据甲的提议,对系统A和系统B进行评估,评估结果如下表所示,那么乙认为(25)。
—Sorry,Ican’tgoshoppingwithyoutonight.—______!
最新回复
(
0
)