首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
76
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
How do parents respond to the scheme?
选项
答案
It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents. Their investment would slump in value. In the end these parents were defeated.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/BySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Next,wefocusonseveralareaswheregender-basedviolenceispervasive:inuniversities,urbansettings,duringwarandmilita
Thiscommercial________wasthesubjectofcontroversyonthelegislationmeeting.
InDecember,WaymoLLC,theleadingdriverlesscarcompany,broughtouttheworld’sfirstcommercialrobo-taxiservice.Butfor
下面你将听到的这段讲话,主题是香港廉政公署和国际刑警组织如何共同合作打击贪污。DistinguishedGuests,LadiesandGentlemen,Firstofall,Iwishtocongratulatethe
主席先生,女士们、先生们:目前,国际形势正处于深刻变化之中。和平与发展仍然是当今时代的主题,总体和平的国际环境为世界经济发展提供了有利条件;科技进步日新月异并孕育着新的重大突破,前所未有地提高了人类认识、把握宏观和微观世界的能力,展现了新的发展
下面你将听到的是一段有关海洋的讲话。海洋是全球生命支持系统的一个不可缺少的组成部分。海洋不仅是自然资源的宝库,同时也是我们人类居住环境的重要调节器。中国政府高度重视海洋的开发和保护,不断加强海洋综合管理,促进海洋产业的协调发展。中国已经
下面你将听到一段关于中国教育状况的介绍。中国人历来重视教育,实施“独生子女”政策后尤为如此。中国家庭的平均教育支出约占其收入的15%,而据中国社会调查所的一项研究成果显示,有43%的家庭都设立了专门账户,用来支付孩子的教育费用。近年来,
调查者发现每天散步有利于睡眠质量。他们同时也提出只有早上锻炼才对晚上睡觉有利。那些晚上锻炼的人实际上有更多的睡眠问题。一个可能的解释是晚上和早上锻炼相比会影响睡眠质量。早上锻炼可能会让生命钟变得有序,而晚上锻炼则会打乱这种秩序。但是还需要更多的调查来证实这
随机试题
女性,60岁,患2型糖尿病lO年,近1个多月来采用强化胰岛素治疗后,空腹血糖仍达8mmol/L以上。下列实验室检查对临床治疗指导意义最大的是
A.协同凝集试验B.正向间接血凝试验C.反向间接血凝试验D.正向间接血凝抑制试验E.反向间接血凝抑制试验先将可溶性抗体和相应的抗原混合,再加入致敏红细胞的是
急性肾损伤少尿期的治疗哪项不妥
现年28岁的路先生在某进出口贸易公司担任高级职员,每月税前收入为9000元。路先生的妻子黄女士今年27岁,在一家外资企业担任文员,每月税前收入为5500元。他们有一个宝贝女儿,今年3岁,正在上幼儿园。路先生夫妇刚刚购买了一套价值60万元的住房,贷款总额为4
张、王、李、赵各出资1/4,设立通程酒吧(普通合伙企业),合伙协议未对相关事项的决议办法作出约定。酒吧开业1年后,经营环境急剧恶化,全体合伙人开会,协商对策。根据合伙企业法律制度的规定,合伙企业通过的下列决议中,有效的是()。
下列有关重要性的说法中,错误的是()。
2011年9月28日10时,常州新华侨饭店入住了三位日本客人,该饭店应当在()向当地公安机关报送住宿登记表。
如图18所示,透明液体折射率为n=,在距离液面深为h=lm处水平放置一反射平面镜,平面镜的下表面涂黑,并可绕中点O在竖直平面内逆时针旋转,一束激光垂直液面射向平面镜O点,并被平面镜反射,在上方可看到液面O’点处有一个光点,to=O时刻平面镜开始逆时针匀速转
Researcherswhorefusetosharedatawithothersmay【31】otherstowithholdresultsfromthem,【32】astudybyhealth-policyanalys
FloresColquecelebratedher118thbirthdaylastmonth.SheistheoldestwomaninBolivia(玻利维亚).Followingthedeathofawoma
最新回复
(
0
)