首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Does the Internet Make You Dumber? [A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to
Does the Internet Make You Dumber? [A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to
admin
2014-06-30
60
问题
Does the Internet Make You Dumber?
[A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to be nowhere. " Today, the Internet grants us easy access to unprecedented amounts of information. But a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that the Net, with its constant distractions and interruptions, is also turning us into disrupted and superficial thinkers.
[B]The picture emerging from the research is deeply troubling, at least to anyone who values the depth, rather than just the velocity(速度), of human thought. People who read text studded with links, the studies show, comprehend less than those who read traditional linear text. People who watch busy multimedia presentations remember less than those who take in information in a more sedate(镇定的)and focused manner. People who are continually distracted by e-mails, alerts and other messages understand less than those who are able to concentrate. And people who juggle(尽力同时应付)many tasks are less creative and less productive than those who do one thing at a time.
[C]The common thread in these disabilities is dispersing our attention. The richness of our thoughts, our memories and even our personalities hinges on our ability to focus the mind and sustain concentration. Only when we pay deep attention to a new piece of information are we able to associate it "meaningfully and systematically with knowledge already well established in memory," writes the Nobel Prize winning neuroscientist(神经科学家)Eric Kandel. Such associations are essential to mastering complex concepts.
[D]When we’re constantly distracted and interrupted, as we tend to be online, our brains are unable to generalize the strong and expansive neural connections that give depth and distinctiveness to our contemplating. We become mere signal-processing units, quickly shepherding disjointed bits of information into and then out of short-term memory.
[E]In an article published in Science last year, Patricia Greenfield, a leading developmental psychologist, reviewed dozens of studies on how different media technologies influence our cognitive abilities. Some of the studies indicated that certain computer tasks, like playing video games, can enhance "visual literacy skills" , increasing the speed at which people can shift their focus among icons and other images on screens. Other studies, however, found that such rapid shifts in focus, even if performed adeptly, result in less rigorous and "more automatic" thinking.
[F]In one experiment conducted at Cornell University, for example, half a class of students was allowed to use Internet-connected laptops during a lecture, while the other had to keep their computers shut. Those who browsed the Web performed much worse on a subsequent test of how well they retained the lecture’s content. While it’s hardly surprising that Web surfing would distract students, it should be a note of caution to schools that are wiring their classrooms in hopes of improving learning.
[G]Ms. Greenfield concluded that " every medium develops some cognitive skills at the expense of others. " Our growing use of screen-based media, she said, has strengthened visual-spatial intelligence, which can improve the ability to do jobs that involve keeping track of lots of simultaneous signals, like air traffic control. But that has been accompanied by " new weaknesses in higher-order cognitive processes," including " abstract vocabulary, mindfulness, reflection, inductive problem solving, critical thinking, and imagination. " We’re becoming, in a word, shallower.
[H]In another experiment, recently conducted at Stanford University’s Communication between Humans and Interactive Media Lab, a team of researchers gave various cognitive tests to 49 people who do a lot of media multitasking and 52 people who multitask much less frequently. The heavy multitaskers performed poorly on all the tests. They were more easily distracted, had less control over their attention, and were much less able to distinguish important information from trivial.
[I]The researchers were surprised by the results. They had expected that the intensive multitaskers would have gained some unique mental advantages from all their on-screen juggling. But that wasn’t the case. In fact, the heavy multitaskers weren’t even good at multitasking. They were considerably less adept at switching between tasks than the more infrequent multitaskers. " Everything distracts them," observed Clifford Nass, the professor who heads the Stanford lab.
[J]It would be one thing if the ill effects went away as soon as we turned off our computers and cellphones. But they don’t. The cellular structure of the human brain, scientists have discovered, adapts readily to the tools we use, including those for finding, storing and sharing information. By changing our habits of mind, each new technology strengthens certain neural pathways and weakens others. The cellular alterations continue to shape the way we think even when we’re not using the technology.
[K]The pioneering neuroscientist Michael Merzenich believes our brains are being "massively remodeled" by our ever-intensifying use of the Web and related media. In the 1970s and 1980s, Mr. Merzenich, now a professor emeritus at the University of California in San Francisco, conducted a famous series of experiments on primate brains that revealed how extensively and quickly neural circuits change in response to experience. When, for example, Mr. Merzenich rearranged the nerves in a monkey’s hand, the nerve cells in the animal’s sensory cortex quickly reorganized themselves to create a new "mental map" of the hand. In a conversation late last year, he said that he was profoundly worried about the cognitive consequences of the constant distractions and interruptions the Internet bombards us with. The long-term effect on the quality of our intellectual lives, he said, could be " deadly".
[L]What we seem to be sacrificing in all our surfing and searching is our capacity to engage in the quieter, attentive modes of thought that underpin contemplation, reflection and introspection. The Web never encourages us to slow down. It keeps us in a state of perpetual mental locomotion. It is revealing, and distressing, to compare the cognitive effects of the Internet with those of an earlier information technology, the printed book. Whereas the Internet scatters our attention, the book focuses it. Unlike the screen, the page promotes contemplativeness.
[M]Reading a long sequence of pages helps us develop a rare kind of mental discipline. The innate bias of the human brain, after all, is to be distracted. Our predisposition is to be aware of as much of what’s going on around us as possible. Our fast-paced, reflexive shifts in focus were once crucial to our survival. They reduced the odds that a predator would take us by surprise or that we’d overlook a nearby source of food.
[N]To read a book is to practice an unnatural process of thought. It requires us to place ourselves at what T. S. Eliot, in his poem "Four Quartets" , called "the still point of the turning world". We have to forge or strengthen the neural links needed to counter our instinctive distractedness, thereby gaining greater control over our attention and our mind.
[O]It is this control, this mental discipline, which we are at risk of losing as we spend ever more time scanning and skimming online. If the slow progression of words across printed pages damped our craving to be inundated by mental stimulation, the Internet indulges it. It returns us to our native state of distractedness, while presenting us with far more distractions than our ancestors ever had to contend with. —Nicholas Carr is the author, most recently, of "The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains".
Unprecedented amounts of information can make our thoughts scattered.
选项
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/BZ17777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Therearemanyunitsbywhichtomeasuretheimpactofclimatechange:degreesofincreasingtemperature,feetofrisingsealev
Amazon,corn’srecentannouncementthatsalesofe-booksattheonlinemegastorehadovertakensalesofhardcoverbookscameas
黄山位于安徽省的南部。它有72座山峰,它被认为是世界上最独特,最美丽的山脉之一,是中国十大风景名胜里唯一的一座山。在中国,如果你爬山,就爬黄山吧!黄山风景四绝:云海、怪石、奇松和温泉。黄山。被称为“中国最美的山”,是中国著名历史上艺术和文学的一部分。现在游
A、Itwillmainlybenefitthewealthy.B、Itwillstimulatebusinessactivities.C、Itwillreducegovernmentrevenues.D、Itwillc
Theconceptofobtainingfreshwaterfromicebergsthataretowedtopopulatedareasandaridregionsoftheworldwasoncetrea
TheamountoffloatingplastictrappedinanorthAtlanticcurrentsystemhasn’tgotanybiggerin22years,despitemoreandmo
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledHowtoEstablishaHealthyLivingStyle?Youshouldwr
Iwishthatearlyon______(我选择当一名导游就好了),althoughIamnotsorrytobecomeateacher.
A、Thewomanshouldchangeanewbattery.B、Thepriceofthewatchisnotreasonable.C、Smith’sJewelryisagoodplacetocheck
A、Someofthemareexpertsinpsychology.B、Theymostlyaimatincautiouspeople.C、Theyshouldchangetheirattitude.D、Theykn
随机试题
核心能力具有较强的辐射作用,是企业核心产品和最终产品的“营养源”,这说明企业核心能力具有()
生物个体、种群和群落都是经典生态学的研究对象。()
患者,女,43岁。眩晕2个月,加重1周,昏眩欲仆,神疲乏力,面色晄白,时有心悸,夜寐欠安。舌淡,脉细。治疗应首选
莪术醇为莪术挥发油的主要成分之一,其结构类型是()。
A.涂膜剂B.气雾剂C.贴膏剂D.凝胶剂E.流浸膏剂中成药因剂型不同,采用的贮存养护方法也不同除另有规定外,应避光,密闭保存,并应防冻的中成药剂型是()。
出入境检验检疫的报检范围有()。
在________对实施项目进行正式评审,其重点是能够为其他项目提供可利用的经验。
王老师在讲授物种分类时,为了让学生更深刻地理解同科属物种的相似性,她利用春游的机会带领学生去当地的自然博物馆参观,有效弥补了学生对物种分类的认知欠缺。王老师采用的教学方法是()。
下列作品属于当代著名作家贾平凹的是()。
根据下面材料,作答下列问题。赵老师告诉张明、孙哲二位同学,明天上午作文课将点评他们的作文,到时请他们现场朗读他们的作文。张明脸上挂着掩饰不住的喜悦之情,而孙哲若有心事,站在赵老师身旁不肯离开,最后请求道:“赵老师,能不能不在班里读我的作文啊?我在
最新回复
(
0
)