首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
admin
2013-05-29
38
问题
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this work most ethically. We concluded that it is vitally important for everyone, scientists and consumers alike, to remain alert to the ethical issues we may face as the world becomes filled with embedded, invisible computers.
Computer chips have been inserted into everyday objects since the earliest days of the microprocessor. Today, an average home might have 40 chips in various devices, from remote controls to alarm clocks to wristwatches. This fact has raised few new ethical issues. But as computers become more and more ubiquitous, and less visually obvious, three questions arise. Firstly, will these chips thinking for us make us forget how to think for ourselves? Secondly, will an "information underclass" without access to these devices be created? And thirdly, will these chips invade our privacy?
The goal of ubiquitous computing is to make technology invisible and, by embedding computers into everyday things, make the things themselves smarter. But will this lead to dumber people with less control over their technology? Automobiles, for example, use embedded computers for a host of functions that improve their performance and reliability. But fewer people now know enough about their car to be their own mechanic. Should this loss of a once common skill concern us? I think not. Ever since the first pre-human shaped a stone into an axe, we have been improving our technology. The invention of the axe did represent a loss of control, because some people were better at making axes than others. But the axe also made life easier, so we had more time to develop other skills, like agriculture, art and writing. As another step along this continuum of invention, ubiquitous computing won’t make people dumber; it will give them time to get smart about other things.
I believe, however, that everyone should be given an equal opportunity to get smart about other things. In this regard, there is legitimate concern that the new ubiquitous computers won’t be equally available to everyone, thus driving a wedge between high-tech "haves" and "have-nots". But it is important to realize that the prime mover behind the latest technology is not the technology itself, but an agreement—the Internet.
Agreeing on low computers should talk to one another on the internet has tremendous advantages for exchanging information, decreasing the cost of technology and creating new market opportunities. If all chips are able to relate to each other, then information can be shared cheaply. This means that Internet access may eventually cost only a dollar or two. If the trend towards ever cheaper, more widespread access to information continues, there will be no information underclass.
Ubiquitous computing will make our lives more convenient, but it will also allow computers to know everything about us. Private actions, such as reading the newspaper, may be shared with other computers—and their owners—all over the world. When computers know so much, whom will they tell?
If a computer runs your toaster, for example, it knows when you make toast, and how many slices. By correlating toast-making activity with the license plate numbers of cars parked in front of your house, a computer could determine if a guest had spent the night. But if you were a married politician, and even if you were not, your might want to keep this information secret.
Democracy is based on the principle that if people have enough information, wise decisions will be made. In an age in which embedded computers will provide us with ever more information, it is vital that the ethical implications of this new technology be openly debated. With a little vigilance and planning, we can reap the benefits of this new technology without compromising our intelligence, our opportunities or our freedom.
It can be inferred that "PARC" is a place where ______.
选项
A、computers are manufactured
B、scientists and consumers live together
C、there are computers embedded all around
D、ethical issues are taught in class
答案
C
解析
首句就指出了“PARC”全面电脑化已近十年了(lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years),可见C为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/9zHO777K
0
研究生英语学位课统考(GET)
相关试题推荐
ChlorineisamainstayinmostswimmingpoolsintheUnitedStates,andisusedtoeradicatebacteria.Abacteria-freepoolwill
ChlorineisamainstayinmostswimmingpoolsintheUnitedStates,andisusedtoeradicatebacteria.Abacteria-freepoolwill
ThedevelopmentandwidespreaduseofcomputertechnologyandtheInternethavetransformedhowwecommunicate,howwecommunica
Youcan______differentkindsofpeople,dictionariesorencyclopediatofindoutwhatyouwishtoknow.
Whatishappeningisasurvival-of-the-fitteststruggleaffecting______smallerfactoriesinrelativelylow-tech,labor-intensi
IthoughtthatitwasaSundaymorninginMay;thatitwasEasterSunday,andasyetveryearlyinthemorning.Iwasstandinga
Governmentisnotmadeinvirtueofnaturalrights,whichmayanddoexistintotalindependenceofit,andexistinmuchgreate
Toparaphrase18th-centurystatesmanEdmundBurke,"Allthatisneededforthetriumphofamisguidedcauseisthatgoodpeople
(复旦大学2010年试题)Businessandgovernmentleadersconsidertheinflationratetobeanimportantgeneralindicator.Inflationis
______theissueofslaveryandracehasbeenfundamentalinAmerica’sdevelopment.
随机试题
ShirleyAllenlovedtosingandplaythepiano.Shestudiedmusicincollege.Herdreamwastobecomea【C1】______orsinger.
关于卵巢的解剖及MRI表现,正确的是
有关乳腺摄影的叙述,错误的是
患者泄泻腹痛,泻而不爽,粪黄褐而臭,肛门灼热,烦躁口渴,小便黄,舌苔黄腻,脉濡数。证属
一般认为,甘草所含有效成分主要包括
孕妇生理性贫血主要是因为()。
“6.26”国际禁毒日,社会工作者小刘组织同伴教育者和志愿者为社区居民开展了几场禁毒知识讲座。为了对讲座的成效进行加过评估,小刘要收集的资料有()
2014年4月,某市一栋大楼起火,导致、15位正在施工的农民工遇难,20余农民工受伤。事故发生后,市政府依法组织有关部门成立事故调查组,对该起重大责任事故原因进行调查。经市政府批复后的事故调查报告认定:建设单位甲公司把装修工程发包给乙公司后,乙公司又将装
下列选项中,不属于桌上检查的检查项目的是A)功能检查B)风格检查C)等价性检查D)检查子程序、宏、函数
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Businessesshoulddoanythingtheycantomakeaprofit.Usespecificreas
最新回复
(
0
)