首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christ
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christ
admin
2014-01-07
97
问题
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christians probably do not realize is that, until recently, other than David’s occurrence in the Bible, there has never been actual proof that he ever existed. Over the years this has given fuel to certain groups wishing to view the Bible as a huge trip into the allegorical. However, all of this changed in 1993. Recently, your author learned for the first time what I am going to attempt to tell about here. You might think that given your faith, it doesn’t really matter whether there is proof of David or not. But think for a moment of the implications of our Bible being definitively proven by actual physical evidence. It would be like having your cake, and someone putting icing on it!!!
In 1993(as told in the March/April 1994 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review), Avraham Biran and his team of archaeologists unearthed a piece of stone with fragments of writing on it. In the writings was the words "House of David". It was the first mention of David in ancient inscription outside the Bible. The fragment was found at Tel Dan which lies by the head waters of the Jordan River, near Israel’s northern border. The large piece of basalt was part of what must have been a large monumental inscription. It contains 13 lines, but no single line is complete. The surviving letters are clear, however. Line 9 contains the words "House of David". After the complete translation, it was determined that the fragment was part of a victory stela erected in Dan by an Aramean boasting a military victory over the House of David. Many questions are raised as well as many possibilities upon comparing the fragment with the Biblical history. For instance the victory of the Aramean would conflict with the episode in the Bible. However as BAR points out, there were probably many battles and not all were recorded in the Bible. We do know that Israel must have regained control of Dan. This find would perhaps seem simple and to the point, but that is far from the truth. The find began a debate in earnest.
Immediately following the find, many came forward to state that the stone did not actually mention the "House of David." Along with this claim came the accusation that those believing that it did mention David were "Biblical Maximizers." The arguing was fast and furious. The debate inspired letters to the editors displaying the anger, emotion, and dismay from Christians. How could this new proof be denied? While the verbal debate raged, researchers and scientists quietly built a case on the very evidence the naysayers demanded. Another scholar, Andre’ Lemaire wrote an article in BAR stating that there was another mention of David in an earlier find. It was called the Mesha Stela proclaiming victory for the Moabite king Mesha over the Israelites.
Then in the Impact section of our own The State in December of last year, an article appeared proclaiming that scientists have found that the Bible is built on facts as well as faith. Many fragments have been found in the same area, all mentioning David. Finally, scholars have reached the consensus that David was real, something many of us have never doubted, even before the stelas were found. Although scholars are not ready to admit the Bible is historically true across the board, they are willing to concede that the "Bible has a sound historical core." One thing is certain, these finds don’t only have repercussions in a religious sense, they reach into many domains—political, personal faith, historical. I can’t say in learning about these finds that my faith has grown any stronger, I can say that I have a new appreciation for the Bible as an accurate historical record as well as a basis of faith.
What is the correct description of the "naysayers"?
选项
A、They feel doubtful about the Bible.
B、They accept the existence of David.
C、They don’t think David was mentioned in the stone.
D、They are regarded exactly as "Biblical Maximizers".
答案
C
解析
第3段第6句表明the naysayers要求得到“证据”,结合本段前几句的内容可以知道naysayers要求得到“大卫确实存在”的证据,由此可见,naysayers是对大卫的存在持怀疑态度的人,因此本题应选C。B的内容和the naysayers的观点相反,不能选;D中的Biblical Maximizers是指相信大卫真实存在的人,这也与the naysayers的观点相反;naysayers针对的是“大卫”,而不是“圣经”,因此A的内容与the naysayers无关。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/98FK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Job-huntingisatoughchallengetothegraduates.Someonesaysgraduationmeansthecomingofunemployment.Provideyouropinio
Therelationshipbetweenemployersandemployeeshasbeenstudied______.
Languagestyleaffectslong-termrelationshipstrengthandthecompatibilityofexistingandwould-becouples,suggestsanewst
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshores,heencounteredcopper-shinnedpeoplewhomhepromptlycalled"Indians".Cu
What’stheseriousproblemthedevelopingcountriesface?
SprintCorp.launchedapaye-mailservicewithYahooInc.foritsmobilephonecustomers,asthecompanieslooktotapintothe
Thenewsitemismainlyaboutajointventurebetween______.
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisCORRECTaboutSaturday’smatch?
ThoughhavingbeenlivinginShanghaifor20years,hestillhasa______northernaccent.
随机试题
患者大便秘结,欲便不得,嗳气频作,胸胁痞满,重则腹中胀痛,纳食减少,舌苔薄腻,脉弦。治疗应首选
洪某在某家电公司购买了一台21寸松下牌彩电,因杂音较重,根据“三包”的规定,洪某享有选择权,他便要求家电公司更换一台,这时,洪某与家电公司的债的转变过程是()。
网卡的主要功能不包括()。
简述运营期生活垃圾对环境的影响。简述外来物种引入的预防措施。
可以使用外汇期权作为风险管理手段的情形有()。
农村信用合作社的基本特征是()。
德育工作中要做到“一把钥匙开一把锁”。()
孩童甲在玩耍时,不慎掉入井盖没有盖严的窨井,跌入井中导致左腿骨折,该井属于市政公路管理局所属。则()。
A、 B、 C、 D、 E、 E
A、Itsuitsthevaluesofequality.B、Itcancauseseriousproblems.C、Itdoesnogood.D、Itgoestoofar.B短文提到,美国式独立经常导致严重的后果,B
最新回复
(
0
)