首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What is special about open-access journals?
What is special about open-access journals?
admin
2022-10-25
53
问题
What is special about open-access journals?
W: Many scientists support open-access in principle but winning jobs, grands, and tenure still requires publication in journals with established reputations. Can open-access journals, like PLoS, Biology both strap themselves into prominence?
M: All the data show that open-access journals have higher citation rates than closed-access journals. That is the reason open-access journals will succeed. There may be a prestige lack, but the value from open-access will erase that quickly. PLoS has from the start published papers of importance far more than any other start of journal, again a measure of the value of open access.
W: In September, the National Institute of Health proposed a new policy requiring all scientists who receive its funding to make their research results available to the public for free. Could it say the new policy, if adopted, could drive some journals out of business and that taxpayers will have to pay for a new open-access system. What’ s your response?
M: Taxpayers are paying for the research. The question is how much researcher should have to pay to get access to the results. We believe that the costs of open access publishing will be far less overall than the existing system. The costs to everyone will, thus, be less and the spread of knowledge greater.
W: Some worried that proprietary pressures are moving upstream to a certain ownership of data and researchers themselves rather than patterns and copyrights on the final research products. Did you share this concern?
M: Absolutely. We’ve expanded intellectual property restrictions without any evidence of the good they will do, and this religion of expansion will cause substantial harm to researcher and comers.
W: What’s the best solution?
M: The best solution is that we give up religion in the context of intellectual property and rely upon evidence. No new regulation should be adopted unless the proponent can show with real evidence that the restriction will do more good than harm.
选项
A、Taxpayers have to pay as much as usual.
B、The costs depend on the research results.
C、The costs will be considerably reduced.
D、Publishing will be made much easier.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/7v0D777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
AstudyinCyberpsychology,Behavior,andSocialNetworkingsuggeststhatartificialintelligenceholdsapromisingfutureinhe
Nobodyeverproteststhatanelementaryschoolshouldbedescribedas"manned"insteadof"staffed,"butdaretosuggesta"men
Doesthelanguagewespeakdeterminehowhealthyandrichwewillbe?NewresearchbyKeithChenofYaleBusinessSchoolsuggest
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofan【C1】________shouldbemad
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofan【C1】________shouldbemad
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofan【C1】________shouldbemad
Generallyspeaking,aBritishiswidelyregardedasaquiet,shyandconservativepersonwhois【C1】________onlyamongthosewith
Generallyspeaking,aBritishiswidelyregardedasaquiet,shyandconservativepersonwhois【C1】________onlyamongthosewith
Whenmymotherlearnedshewaspregnantwithme,myparentssatdownoneSundaymorningtoreviewtheirfinances.Turningonthe
Sothetheoriesoftheschoolsaredifferentfromthepracticeofordinarybusinessthatmuchofwhichhelearnedintheformer
随机试题
甲公司拥有3幢房产,分别为A厂房、B仓库和C办公大楼,其中C办公大楼为甲公司和乙公司按份共有,甲公司占70%的份额,乙公司占30%份额。2015年发生了下列事项:(1)1月1日,甲公司与丙银行签订了流动资金周转借款合同,期限为1年,设定最高限额为500万
联系实际论述艺术创作的基本过程及每个环节的特征。
氯丙嗪阻断α受体而引起直立性低血压。
A.博来霉素B.多柔比星C.长春新碱D.环磷酰胺E.顺铂具有比较严重的神经毒性的是
下列除哪项外,均属脾肾阳虚经行浮肿的主证
河南境内黄河主要支流有()
关于教学与发展的关系,维果茨基的基本观点是()。
网络系统中,通常把()置于DMZ区。
Thereareseveraldifferentmethodsthatcanbeusedtocreateaforecast.Themethodaforecasterchoosesdependsupontheexpe
Theschoollibraryboughtanewbatchofbooksandmagazinesthismonth.Afterthelibrariansortedthemout,eachbookandmaga
最新回复
(
0
)