首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It is simple enough to say that since books have classes -- fiction, biography, poetry -- we should separate them and take from
It is simple enough to say that since books have classes -- fiction, biography, poetry -- we should separate them and take from
admin
2011-01-13
57
问题
It is simple enough to say that since books have classes -- fiction, biography, poetry -- we should separate them and take from each what it is right and what should give us. Yet few people ask from books what can give us. Most commonly we come to books with blurred and divided minds, asking of fiction that it shall be true, of poetry that it shall be false, of biography that it shall be flattering, of history that it shall enforce our own prejudices. If we could banish all such preconception when we read, that would be an admirable beginning. Do not dictate to your author; try to become him. Be his fellow-worker and accomplice. If you hang back, and reserve and criticize at first, you are preventing yourself from getting the fullest possible value from what you read. But if you open your mind as widely as possible, then signs and hints of almost imperceptible fineness, from the twist and turn of the first sentences, will bring you into the presence of a human being unlike any other. Steep yourself in this, acquaint yourself with this, and soon you will find that your author is giving you, or attempting to give you, something far more definite. The 32 chapters of a novel -- if we consider how to read a novel first -- are an attempt to make something as formed and controlled as a building: but words are more impalpable than bricks; reading is a longer and more complicated process than seeing. Perhaps the quickest way to understand the elements of what a novelist is doing is not to read, but to write; to make your own experiment with the dangers and difficulties of words. Recall, then, some event that has left a distinct impression on you -- how at the comer of the street, perhaps, you passed two people talking. A tree shock; an electric light danced; the tone of the talk was comic, but also tragic; a whole vision, an entire conception, seemed contained in that moment.
But when you attempt to reconstruct it in words, you will find that it breaks into a thousand conflicting impressions. Some must be subdued; others emphasized; in the process you will lose, probably, all grasp upon the emotion itself. Then turn from your blurred and littered pages to the opening pages of some great novelist -- Defoe, Jane Austen, Hardy. Now you will be better able to appreciate their mastery. It is not merely that we are in the presence of a different person -- Defoe, Jane Austen, or Thomas Hardy -- but that we are living in a different world. Here, in Robinson Crusoe, we are trudging a plain high road; one thing happens after another; the fact and the order of the fact is enough. But if the open air and adventure mean everything to Defoe, they mean nothing to Jane Austen. Here is the drawing-room, and people talking, and by the many mirrors of their talk revealing their characters. And if, when we have accustomed ourselves to the drawing-room and its reflections, we turn to Hardy, we are once more spun around. The moors are round us and the stars are above our heads. The other side of the mind is now exposed -- the dark side that comes uppermost in solitude, not the light side that shows in company. Our relations are not towards people, but towards Nature and destiny. Yet different as these worlds are, each is consistent with itself. The maker of each is careful to observe the laws of his own perspective, and however great a strain they may put upon, they will never confuse us, as lesser writers so frequently do, by introducing two different kinds of reality into the same book. Thus to go from one great novelist to another -- from Jane Austen to Hardy, from Peacock to Trollope, from Scott to Meredith -- is to be wrenched and uprooted; to be thrown this way and then that. To read a novel is a difficult and complex art. You must be capable not only of great fineness of perception, but of great boldness of imagination if you are going to make use of all that the novelist -- the great artist -- gives you.
When we begin to read a book, ______.
选项
A、we are eager to know the result of the book
B、we have formed some ideas beforehand
C、we have some prejudice against the author
D、we are doubtful about the facts to be shown
答案
B
解析
推断题型见第一段第三、四句:最常见的是我们拿到书时头脑模糊,意见分歧;期望小说讲的是真事,诗歌是虚假的,传记是恭维的,史书会加深我们的偏见。如果我们在读书时能摒弃所有这些先期的偏见,那会是一个极好的开端;由此可推断出我们读书时,脑海中会有一些业已形成的看法。因此B为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/7f5O777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Manyantsforageacrossthecountrysideinlargenumbersandundertakemassmigrations;theseactivitiesproceedbecauseone
TheEvolutionofthePhotofitSecuritytechnology:Anewtypeofcomputerisedphotofitsystemtakesanovelevolutionaryapp
NarratorListentoalecturetalkaboutbassinbusinessclass.Whichchoicebasedonthestatements"Asurgeindemanddr
WORKANDFAMILYROLESFamilyrolesclearlyhavedifferenteffectsonmen’sandwomen’sworkroles,andthereisadifference
EconomicsListenagaintopartofthelecture.Thenanswerthequestion.Whatdoestheprofessorimplyaboutthesupplyofago
TheWritingsectiontestsyourabilitytowriteessaysinEnglishsimilartothosethatyouwouldwriteincollegecourses.
IsEarthGettingWarmer?TheNationalAcademyofSciencesclaimedrecentlythatpeopleshouldcautionratherthanpanicabou
IsEarthGettingWarmer?TheNationalAcademyofSciencesclaimedrecentlythatpeopleshouldcautionratherthanpanicabou
随机试题
甲、乙、丙三人各出资100万元共同设立一有限责任公司。公司章程规定:甲为公司董事长、法定代表人,并兼任监事会主席。公司依法成立后,甲的朋友王某向银行借款100万元,甲决定以公司名义为这笔借款提供担保。问题:公司章程中关于甲的任职规定是否合法?
_______就是把一个字符的各数据位用几条线同时进行传输。
A.中心性发绀B.周围性发绀C.混合性发绀D.血管性晕厥E.阿-斯综合征缩窄性心包炎患者肺泡毛细血管血液中的氧气在组织中过多消耗引起
配电线路的敷设应符合下列()条件。
关于我国经济体制的说法,错误的是()
阅读以下文字。完成16~20题。曹雪芹在全书第一回就表明了自己的创作主张,他不蹈历来野史的旧辙,更反对才子佳人小说的“干部一腔,千人一面”和“假控出二人姓名,又必旁添一小人,拨乱其间”;而是根据自己“半世亲见亲闻来创作”,“其间离合悲欢,兴衰际遇,俱是按迹
1930年前后,毛泽东认为,中国革命面临暂时的困难,但是红色政权将继续存在和发展的根本原因是()
(16)设二次型f(x1,x2,x3)=a(x12+x22+x32)+2x1x2+2x2x3+2x1x3的正、负惯性指数分别为l,2,则
关于HFC的描述中,错误的是()。
软件设计模块化的目的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)