首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2010-01-13
110
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
B
解析
因为由第三段可知,非盈利机构发现意见冲突大有益处,其结果必然是大家畅所欲言,即,很自由地表达不同意见。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/7Vmi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
Revengeisoneofthosethingsthateveryoneenjoys.Peopledon’tliketotalkaboutit,though.Justthesame,thereisnothing
A:Youseemtohavealotofworktodoinyouroffice.You’vealwaysbeenworkingovertime.B:______
(Thefirst)electriclamphadtwocarbonrods(fromwhich)vapor(served)toconductthecurrent(across)thegap.
ThecostoflivinginLiberia,WestAfrica,has______inthepastfiveyearsbecauseoftheinternalconflicts.
Directions:Inthispart,youaretowritewithin30minutesacompositionofnolessthan150wordsaboutMyApproachtoPerson
Directions:Inthispart,youaretowritewithin30minutesacompositionofnolessthan150wordsaboutCanWeProfitMorefr
ProfessorJohnson’sretirement______fromnextJunuary.
A.professionalB.asC.writingA.reachtheirpersonaland【T1】______goalsB.hastrouble【T2】______C.aslow-tech【T3】_
(Writing)inaclearandtersestyle,thebook(describes)the(author’s)childhoodexperiencesinasmalltown(justbefore)th
随机试题
求∫10xarcsinxdx。
Becauseitistouristseason,weinsistthat______(应该预订房间).
男,25岁,创伤后右髋部疼痛,不能活动,右大腿后侧及右小腿后外侧有麻木。查体:右下肢短缩、屈曲、内收、内旋畸形,手法复位后畸形矫正,髋关节活动恢复正常,但上述区域麻木感仍存在,膝以下感觉迟钝,小腿和足部肌力Ⅲ级。X线片示:右髋臼后上缘有1cm×2cm骨块,
《素问.五藏生成篇》说:“多食甘”,则
回阳救急汤除回阳救急外,还具有的功用是
下列各种财产损溢情况,经批准后在账务处理时可增减管理费用的有()。
好的自我介绍是成功交流的开端。自我介绍的基本要求有()。
思维的品质包括广阔性与深刻性、独立性与批判性、________、逻辑性和严谨性。
下列各句中,没有语病的一句是()。
Nowadays,incominggenerationsreallyrelynowonthepowerofthe"Internet"whenitcomestosearchingforinformation.Justt
最新回复
(
0
)