首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If you were told that a particularly delicious-looking ice-cream cone(圆筒)contained dangerous chemicals, then told soon after tha
If you were told that a particularly delicious-looking ice-cream cone(圆筒)contained dangerous chemicals, then told soon after tha
admin
2013-09-24
60
问题
If you were told that a particularly delicious-looking ice-cream cone(圆筒)contained dangerous chemicals, then told soon after that it was safe to eat after all)would you still choose it for dessert? So far, studies by behavioural economists have suggested that people have a hard time unlearning(忘记)what they have previously been told, even after being ordered to do so. But Uri Simonsohn, a professor of marketing at the University of Pennsylvania, has a forthcoming paper suggesting that some consumers, at least, are indeed capable of letting go of wrong information.
Mr. Simonsohn started by having to dismiss wrong information himself. In early 2007, shortly after he and his wife had bought a car seat for their first child, Consumer Reports magazine published a ranking of car seats according to safety. Unfortunately, the magazine had messed up its usually thorough testing procedure, with cars being crashed at much higher speeds than advertised. At a 35-mph side-impact crash, the structure of the car seat can make a difference; at 70 mph, the infant’s safety depends much more on the structure of the car. Two weeks later, Consumer Reports issued a retraction(收回声明): several car seat brands(including the Simonsohns’)were safer than the original rankings suggested. Mr. Simonsohn tracked online auctions of car seats after both the initial rankings and the retractions, to see how prices were affected. The car seats falsely charged with poor performance saw their prices drop, then rebound quickly. By contrast, one seat, which failed both Consumer Reports’ original and revised tests, continued to sell more cheaply after the retraction was issued. The car-seat buyers were apparently able to disregard the flawed rankings and pay attention to the correct information.
It helps, Mr. Simonsohn admits, that both the original rankings and the retraction were widely publicised: child-safety issues attract headlines. That the retraction was made swiftly may also have focussed consumers’ attention: a time lapse of months or more might have affected sales more profoundly.
What was Uri Simonsohn’s idea?
选项
A、Some consumers can unlearn the wrong information.
B、Everyone can be able to dismiss the wrong information.
C、Car seats for children are unsafe.
D、People should not believe Consumer Reports magazine.
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。根据定位句可知,Simonsohn教授的观点是一些消费者确实能够忘掉那些有误的信息,故答案为A)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/7Jc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Wefindthatbrightchildrenarerarelyheldbackbymixedabilityteaching.Onthecontrary,boththeirknowledgeand【B1】______
ExchangeRates:ABriefHistoryofExchangeRatesForcenturies,thecurrenciesoftheworldwerebackedbygold.Thatis,apie
Peoplewho______(对…敏感)woolshouldn’twearwoolenclothing.
RecentstudiesbytheCouncilofEuropeshowthat______.Althoughitisdifficultnowadaystoconvincethepublicoftheimpor
A、Hedidnotlikethewaythespeakerborrowedbicyclesfromfriends.B、Hethoughtthatcarswerefasterthanmotorcycles.C、He
A、Inahotel.B、Inarestaurant.C、Inahospital.D、Inashop.A根据对话可以判断答案是A。
Thestarsareusuallyactorsandactresses.Mostpeopledonotevenlookatthenameofthedirectororproducer,exceptone-Ste
A、Theplanethatcrashedwasreturningfromatradefair.B、TheplanethatcrashedwasonaregularflighttoCarlisle.C、Thepl
InsideasmallchamberataKentStateUniversitylaboratory,hamsterssleep,eat,playandrestwhilefluidflowsinandoutof
Onaverage,itissaid,visitorsspendonly____________(一半的钱)inadayinLeedsasinLondon.
随机试题
患儿,男,9岁。水肿、血尿10天,进行性少尿8天。10天前晨起发现双颊水肿,尿发红,8天前尿色变浅,但尿量进行性减少。查体:体温36.9℃,呼吸24次/分,血压145/80mmHg。发育正常,营养中等,重病容。化验:尿蛋白(++),镜检白细胞(+)/HP,
加碘预防地方性甲状腺肿是易感者注射乙肝疫苗
颗粒不够干燥或药物易吸湿会引起( )。颗粒粗细相差悬殊或颗粒流动性差时会产生( )。
关于颈丛阻滞,哪一项是错误的?()
财务顾问业务的监管主体有()
如果不考虑影响股价的其他因素,零增长股票的价值与市场利率成正比,与预期股利成反比。()
下列关于互斥项目排序的表述中,错误的是()。
下列选项中,不会引起收入水平的上升的是()。
简述汉武帝加强中央集权的主要措施。
HowtoStartaSmallBusinessintheUSPeoplefromothercountriesoftentakeAmericaasthe"landofopportunity".America
最新回复
(
0
)