首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2012-02-02
60
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Griven the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions. (253 words)
People working in a not-for-profit organization______.
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/6Cna777K
本试题收录于:
艺术硕士(艺术基础)题库专业硕士分类
0
艺术硕士(艺术基础)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
IntheUnitedStates,itisimportanttobeontime,orpunctual,foranappointment,aclass,ameeting,etc.However,thismay
Attentiontodetailissomethingeveryonecanandshoulddo—especiallyinatightjobmarket.BobCrossley,ahuman-resourcesex
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷漠)andstagnation(呆滞).
In1985whenaJapanAirLines(JAL)jetcrashed,itspresident,YasumotoTakagi,calledeachvictim’sfamilytoapologize,and
Americansarepoundoftheirvarietyandindividuality,yettheyloveandrespectfewthingsmorethanauniform,whetheritis;
Mostepisodesofabsent-mindedness—forgettingwhereyouleftsomethingorwonderingwhyyoujustenteredaroom—arecausedbya
MozartwasborninwhatisnowcalledAustri,but,atthattime,itwaspartoftheHolyRomanEmpire.Hewasbaptizedthedaya
PresidentCoolidge’sstatement,"ThebusinessofAmericaisbusiness,"stillpointstoanimportanttruthtoday—thatbusinessin
PresidentCoolidge’sstatement,"ThebusinessofAmericaisbusiness,"stillpointstoanimportanttruthtoday—thatbusinessin
Theclocktowerlooksoutovera38一hectarecampusgracedbyanornamentallakeandapillaredcentralhall.Addalittleivyand
随机试题
抗真菌药(antifungalagents)
缓凝剂是指能够延长水泥凝固时间的物质,如氯化钙、氯化钡、水玻璃等。
指数平滑预测方法是一种()
在一定的把握程度下,根据样本统计值和抽样的平均误差,对总体统计值落入区间范围的估计叫作()
在疾病进行期突然出现核右移,提示()
肾肿瘤病人部分切除术后需卧床
下列关于施工缝的处理方式,正确的有()。
在考生文件夹下,打开文档word1.docx,按照要求完成下列操作并以该文件名(word1.docx)保存文档。【文档开始】专家预测大型TFT业经显示器市场将复苏大型TFT业经市场已经开始趋向饱和,产品供大于求,价格正在下滑。不过,据美国Di
世界上有很多种野生动物面临着绝种的危险。印度尼西亚生活在保护区内的天堂鸟,70年代末还有500来只,现在只剩下55只;海豹正从北海消失;非洲野狗面临灭绝的威胁,估计南非现在仅残存350只;上个世纪非洲共有1000万头大象,而现在幸存下来的野象可能只有40万
A、IttookplaceiiiChicagoin1859.B、Fourcarspoweredbypetroltookpartinit.C、Onlyonecarmaker,HenryFordwasunablet
最新回复
(
0
)