首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Civil-Liberties advocates reeling from the recent revelations on surveillance had something else to worry about last week: the p
Civil-Liberties advocates reeling from the recent revelations on surveillance had something else to worry about last week: the p
admin
2012-01-05
82
问题
Civil-Liberties advocates reeling from the recent revelations on surveillance had something else to worry about last week: the privacy of the billions of search queries made on sites like Google, AOL, Yahoo and Microsoft. As part of a long-running court case, the government has asked those companies to turn over information on its users’ search behavior. All but Google have handed over data, and now the Department of Justice (DOJ) has moved to compel the search giant to turn over the goods.
What makes this case different is that the intended use of the information is not related to national security, but the government’s continuing attempt to police Internet pornography. In 1998, Congress passed the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), but courts have blocked its implementation due to First Amendment concerns. In its appeal, the DOJ wants to prove how easy it is to inadvertently stumble upon pore. In order to conduct a controlled experiment—to be performed by a UC Berkeley professor of statistics—the DOJ wants to use a large sample of actual search terms from the different search engines. It would then use those terms to do its own searches, employing the different kinds of filters each search engine offers, in an attempt to quantify how often "material that is harmful to minors" might appear. Google contends that since it is not a party to the case, the government has not right to demand its proprietary information to perform its test. "We intend to resist their motion vigorously," said Google attorney Nicole Wong.
DOJ spokesperson Charles Miller says that the government is requesting only the actual search terms, and not anything that would link the queries to those who made them. (The DOJ is also demanding a list of a million Web sites that Google indexes to determine the degree to which objectionable sites are searched. ) Originally, the government asked for a treasure trove of all searches made in June and July 2005; the request has been scaled back to one week’s worth of search queries.
One oddity about the DOJ’s strategy is that the experiment could conceivably sink its own case. If the built-in filters that each search engine provides are effective in blocking porn sites, the government will have wound up proving what the opposition has said all along—you don’t need to suppress speech to protect minors on the Net."We think that our filtering technology does a good job protecting minors from inadvertently seeing adult content," says Ramez Naam, group program manager of MSN Search.
Though the government intends to use these data specifically for its COPA-related test, it’s possible that the information could lead to further investigations and, perhaps, subpoenas to find out who was doing the searching. "What if certain search terms indicated that people were contemplating terrorist actions or other criminal activities?" Says the DOJ’s Miller, "I’m assuming that if something raised alarms, we would hand it over to the proper authorities." Privacy advocates fear that if the government request is upheld, it will open the door to further government examination of search behavior. One solution would be for Google to stop storing the information, but the company hopes to eventually use the personal information of consenting customers to improve search performance. " Search is a window into people’s personalities," says Kurt Opsahl, an Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney. "They should be able to take advantage of the Internet without worrying about Big Brother looking over their shoulders."
When Kurt Opsahl says that "They should be able to take advantage of the Internet without worrying about Big Brother looking over their shoulders." ( Para. 5 ), the expression "Big Brother" is used to refer to ______.
选项
A、a friend or relative showing much concern
B、a colleague who is much more experienced
C、a dominating and all-powerful ruling power
D、a benevolent and democratic organization
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/6Aua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
equalityandmutualbenefit
disparatedevelopment
TheculturalandreligiouscrisisthroughwhichtheRomanEmpirewaspassinginthefourthcenturyisoneofthemostsignifican
ReportssuggestHSBCcouldseektocutanadditional8,000~10,000jobsfromitsheadcountof238,000(aspokespersondeclinedto
VirginiaWoolfwasanimportantfemale()inthe20thcenturyEngland.
Asitturnedouttobeasmallhouseparty,we______soformally.
Hehasbeenresisting______pressuretoresignastheheadoftheorganization.
Self-relianceisanineteenth-centuryterm,popularizedbyRalphWaldoEmerson’sfamousessayofthattime,butitstillcomese
Overthecenturies,varioustheorieshavebeen______toexplaintheoriginofalphabeticwriting.
Thereisnodoubtthatthe______ofthesegoodstotheothersiseasytosee.
随机试题
吴某,女,78岁。胸痛反复10余年,加剧半小时,现胸闷,心前区疼痛,痛彻肩背,心慌,大汗出,四肢厥冷,面色唇甲青紫,脉沉微欲绝。宜选用方
甲承包养鱼池养鱼。酒业公司的排水渠泄漏,废水流入养鱼池,导致鱼苗死亡。甲向县环保局申请行政处理。县环保局责令酒业公司限期改正,并处以罚款。同时,经县环保局调解,甲与酒业公司就赔偿数额达成协议。酒业公司未履行赔偿协议,甲要求县环保局强制执行该协议,县环保局拒
如果两个以上行政机关共同作出同种具体行政行为,当事人对该具体行政行为提起诉讼,则被告()。
根据合伙企业法律制度的规定,合伙协议未约定合伙人之间利润分配和亏损分担比例的,其利润分配和亏损分担的原则是()。
幼儿园应与()密切合作,与小学相互衔接,综合利用各种教育资源,共同为幼儿的发展创造良好的条件。
一天你在街上看到一位衣衫整洁的老人显得很慌张,并且精神有些恍惚,你上前询问,却发现他不记得任何亲人的联系方式。作为一名公安干警,你会怎么做?
阅读下列说明和图,回答问题l至问题3,将解答填入答题纸的对应栏内。【说明】某银行计划开发一个自动存提款机模拟系统(ATMSystem)。系统通过读卡器((:ardReader)读取ATM卡;系统与客户(Customer)的交互由客户控制台(Custo
当循环队列非空且队尾指针等于队头指针时,说明循环队列已满,不能进行入队运算。这种情况称为【】。
对声音波形采样时,采样频率越高,声音文件的数据量()。
Onecharacteristicoftherichclassesofadecliningsocietyistheirtendencyto______.WhichofthefollowingisNOTanele
最新回复
(
0
)