首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2019-03-04
54
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
With the help of online lectures, professors can______.
选项
A、use the classroom time more effectively
B、have more face-to-face time with students
C、develop more materials for offline instruction
D、enjoy more free time and breaks between classes
答案
A
解析
根据第5段最后一句“Yes,hybrid courses…more effectively spent”,可排除B,确定选A,而C,D文中没有提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/5d9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
HereisaletterfromColoradoStateUniversitytoinformtheapplicantMr.LithathehasbeenadmittedtoCognitivePsychology
HereisaletterwhichcomplainsaboutthequalityoftheTVsetboughtinastore.Readtheletterandcompletethegiveninfor
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
Lookatthefollowingstatement:Beingcreativeisthekeytocareersuccess.Doyouagreeordisagreew
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
Readthefollowingarticleandanswerquestions19-25.Forquestions19-25,choosethecorrectanswerA,B,CorD.Mark
Readthefollowingarticleandanswerquestions19-25.Forquestions19-25,choosethecorrectanswerA,B,CorD.Mark
Readthefollowingarticleandanswerquestions9-18onthenextpage.HappinessSecretsforToughTimes1.
Readthefollowingpassageanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26~45,markoneletterA,B,CorDo
随机试题
平衡膳食中提供热能占总膳食热能5%以下的食物是
强心苷治疗心房纤颤的机制主要是()
西方最早的经典医德文献是制定有关人体试验的基本原则的是
某银行的贷款客户因为经营不善、无法偿还该银行的债务,已向人民法院提出破产清算的申请,下列说法正确的有()。
安徽是戏曲之乡,发源于安徽的()是京剧的主要源流之一。
病例:患者,男,40岁,主诉空腹时有上腹痛,进食后缓解2个月余。秋冬季季节性发作3年,经胃镜检查确诊为十二指肠溃疡。治疗本病采用三(四)联疗法,下列说法正确的是()。
对未取得《修理计量器具许可证》而对外经营修理计量器具的违法行为,可给予行政处罚的是()。
国家行政赔偿的主要方式是精神赔偿。()
原型定义与严格定义有着不同的策略,下述观点Ⅰ.不是所有需求都能事先准备定义Ⅱ.存在快速建造系统的工具Ⅲ.项目参加者能够准确地进行通信Ⅳ.需要实际且用户可参与的系统模型Ⅴ.个性系统需要高昂的代价哪些不符合原型化
在电子商务中,保证数据的安全性就是______。
最新回复
(
0
)