首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. •For each question 15—20, mark one letter (
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. •For each question 15—20, mark one letter (
admin
2013-02-14
87
问题
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business.
•For each question 15—20, mark one letter (A, B, C, or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Since the days of Henry Ford’s dominance of the car market in the 1920s up to the present day, the car industry has continued to grow. Some companies, such as British Leyland, failed to survive the turbulent business world of the 1970s despite being government-owned. During the 1960s and 1970s, as growth in profit became more difficult to achieve due to increased competition, mainly from the Japanese, the industry turned to efficient production methods in order to create a competitive advantage. However, once all the major players in the industry had become as efficient as possible, developing a cost advantage was more difficult to achieve. In addition, car companies from Asia, such as Daewoo, Samsung and Kia, have developed cheaper, more affordable alternatives for the discerning western buyers. Such car companies are part-funded by their respective governments but enjoy considerably lower labor costs.
Increasing productive capacity has led to car companies aiming to use economies of scale as the main way of reducing cost, although this has unfortunately led to businesses having surplus capacity. This spare capacity occurs when the industry as a whole expands ahead of, or in anticipation of, a growth in customer demand. Such growth in capacity has meant that supply outstrips demand by some 30%, i.e., car companies could cut back on their capacity levels by 30%, and still meet all customer demands.
The result has been a series of joint agreements and mergers between car companies, with a view to either using capacity, or losing capacity altogether by selling off parts of a business. The other problem is the high cost of developing new vehicles: the standard response to the high cost is to either rejuvenate or re-launch old vehicles with new technology. But there are enough companies developing new models that any business, which does not, stands to lose out. The main fear in the car industry is over-capacity—experts predict that by 2001, the industry may produce 23 million cars more than it can sell!
In 1998 there was a spate of company mergers—e.g. In January 1999, Ford paid £4 billion for Volvo’s car division; Volvo claimed that it needed economies of scale, allowing it to focus on buses, engines and aerospace and to acquire shares in two major truck-making businesses. Ford intended to distribute Volvos with its own cars and hoped to use Volvo’s reputation for technological excellence to develop new cars, using common research platforms to save money.
Renault, on the other hand, announced a joint agreement with Nissan, the debt-ridden Japanese company, to purchase a 37% stake. For Renault, the problem was not over-capacity, but rather the lack of product range. Renault was 44% owned by the French government, which obviously wanted to protect one of its major companies and wealth creators. However, Renault had concentrated its major marketing effort on domestic demand in France; as the domestic market fell, profit tumbled. The expiry in 1999 of the "gentlemen’s agreement" which limited car sales from Japan was probably the main reason for teaming up with Nissan. Nissan, however, had borrowed approximately £15 billion in order to expand its productive capacity and had lost money in six of the last seven years. One estimate put 1998’s losses at nearly £1 billion. The cost savings for both companies are not likely to occur until 2002, resulting mainly from purchasing economies of scale. Renault seems to have got caught between the large manufacturers who achieve economies of scale and the smaller specialist manufacturers.
During the 1960s and 1970s, in order to create a competitive advantage, the car industry turned to
选项
A、economies of scale.
B、efficient production methods.
C、surplus capacity.
D、joint agreement and mergers.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/5F7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whatdoesthespeaker’scompanydo?
Whatdoesthecompanywanttodo?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatisthecompany’spriority?
Inthispart,theinterlocutorasksquestionstoeachofthecandidatesinturn.Youhavetogiveinformationaboutyourselfand
Question询问
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
Practisediscussingthistask,andthequestionswhichfollowit,withapartner:STAFFTRAININGREVIEWTheorganisationyouwor
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
•YouwillheartheChairmanoftheBusinessBroadcastingCommitteeofatelevisioncompany.Heisaddressingameetingofthec
随机试题
下列关于滤镜的操作原则哪些是不正确的?
标定费林氏液时,基准乳糖的干燥温度为()。
1)______theOralApproach2)______theCognitiveApproach3)______theCommunicativeApproach4)______theA
Theonlywaytostayaheadofthe______(compete)isqualitycontrol.
某市煤气公司液化气站的102号400m3液化石油气球罐发生破裂,大量液化石油气喷出,顺风向北扩散,遇明火发生燃烧,引起球罐爆炸。由于该球罐爆炸燃烧,大火烧了19个小时,致使5个400m3球罐,4个450m3卧罐和8000多只液化石油气瓶(其中空瓶3000多
【背景资料】某商务办公楼工程建设项目由J建设工程公司承建。该工程处于基础底板钢筋绑扎施工阶段的某日,上级有关部门对该工地进行突击安全检查,按照《建筑施工安全监察标准》JGJ59—2011的要求,对包括安全管理、文明施工、脚手架、基坑工程、模板
organizationalnetworkcorporateculturetalkingwithotherworkersmajorimpactA.by(68)______andthroughtheirexperienceso
已知A是3阶不可逆矩阵,一1和2是A的特征值,B=A2一A一2E,求B的特征值,并问B能否相似对角化,并说明理由.
DrRichardBergland,abrainresearcherattheHarvardMedicalSchool,haswrittenapapersuggestingthathumanbrainisbasica
张某是H公司的软件设计师,张某按照公司要求并完成软件开发后,均按公司规定编写软件文档,并提交公司存档。那么该软件文档的著作权()享有。
最新回复
(
0
)