首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
admin
2015-03-27
83
问题
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago, and the subject was salt. Researchers were claiming that salt supplementation was unnecessary after strenuous exercise, and this advice was being passed on by health reporters. All I knew was that I had played high school football in suburban Maryland, sweating profusely through double sessions in the swamp like 90-degree days of August. Without salt pills, I couldn’t make it through a two-hour practice; I couldn’t walk across the parking lot afterward without cramping.
While sports nutritionists have since come around to recommend that we should indeed replenish salt when we sweat it out in physical activity, the message that we should avoid salt at all other times remains strong. Salt consumption is said to raise blood pressure, cause hypertension and increase the risk of premature death. This is why the Department of Agriculture’s dietary guidelines still consider salt Public Enemy No. 1, coming before fats, sugars and alcohol. It’ s why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has suggested that reducing salt consumption is as critical to long-term health as quitting cigarettes.
And yet, this eat-less-salt argument has been surprisingly controversial—and difficult to defend. Not because the food industry opposes it, but because the actual evidence to support it has always been so weak.
When I spent the better part of a year researching the state of the salt science back in 1998— already a quarter century into the eat-less-salt recommendations—journal editors and public health administrators were still remarkably candid in their assessment of how flimsy the evidence was implicating salt as the cause of hypertension.
While, back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence from studies published over the past two years actually suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as litde salt as the U.S.D.A. and theC.D.C. recommend, we’d be harming rather than helping ourselves.
Why have we been told that salt is so deadly? Well, the advice has always sounded reasonable. It has what nutritionists like to call "biological plausibility". Eat more salt and your body retains water to maintain a stable concentration of sodium in your blood. This is why eating salty food tends to make us thirsty: we drink more; we retain water. The result can be a temporary increase in blood pressure, which will persist until our kidneys eliminate both salt and water.
The scientific question is whether this temporary phenomenon translates to chronic problems: if we eat too much salt for years, does it raise our blood pressure, cause hypertension, then strokes, and then kill us prematurely? It makes sense, but it’s only a hypothesis. The reason scientists do experiments is to find out if hypotheses are true.
The N.I.H. has spent enormous sums of money on studies to test the hypothesis, and those studies have singularly failed to make the evidence any more conclusive.
With nearly everyone focused on the supposed benefits of salt restriction, little research was done to look at the potential dangers. But four years ago, Italian researchers began publishing the results from a series of clinical trials, all of which reported that, among patients with heart failure, reducing salt consumption increased the risk of death.
According to the passage, when were people recommended to eat less salt?
选项
A、Around the early 1990s.
B、Around the early 1980s.
C、Around the early 1970s.
D、Around the early 1960s.
答案
C
解析
作者在第一段说,他第一次质疑健康饮食的本质—以盐为主题,是在40年前,因此可得出答案为20世纪70年代左右。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/4wCv777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
Ifateacherstartswithlanguageexamplesandguidesstudentstoworkouttherules,he/sheisusingthe______method.
Whichofthefollowingactivitiesactuallydoesnotinvolvewriting?
Plantsandanimalsthathavebeenstudiedcarefullyseemtohavebuilt-inclocks.Thesebiologicalclocks,astheyarecalled,u
Whatdothefollowingsentencespractice?PeterandIwenttothecinemayesterday.PeterandIwenttothecinemayesterday.Pe
Toteachstudentswritingeffectively,teachersmayguidestudentsthroughthewritingprocessasfollows:①mapping②editing③ou
DeathValleyisoneofthemostfamousdesertsintheUnitedStates,coveringawideareawithitsalkalisand.Almost20percen
DeathValleyisoneofthemostfamousdesertsintheUnitedStates,coveringawideareawithitsalkalisand.Almost20percen
DeathValleyisoneofthemostfamousdesertsintheUnitedStates,coveringawideareawithitsalkalisand.Almost20percen
OneoftheexecutivesgatheredattheAspenInstituteforaday-longleadershipworkshopusingtheworksofShakespearewasdi
随机试题
诊断脑瘫的依据包括
在D盘下新建一个Excel工作簿,完成以下操作:(1)在Sheet1工作表的A1:H6区域中建立和编辑如题54表所示的数据表。(2)设置“班级学习成绩表”为居中、加粗、字号20,“高一”、“高二”和“高三”为居中、加粗、字号16,各
在我国刑法的时间效力上,采取的原则是()。
异烟肼每日用量超过500mg时,主要的不良反应是
一位亚急性细菌性心内膜炎患者,下床活动后出现意识逐渐模糊至昏迷,并有右侧偏瘫,其最可能的原因是
A.外感风寒证B.外感风湿证C.暑湿疫毒证D.寒湿困脾证E.气血两虚证
女,30岁。北京郊区农民。因一周来发热,尿少2天,半天来无尿于1月20日来诊。一直高热,T39℃以上,伴头痛、全身痛,发病3日在当地医院诊治,查血压70/50mmHg,抗休克、抗感染治疗,疗效不著。尿少2天,每日400ml,半天来无尿而来本院。居住地有老
可行性研究阶段应考虑的技术方面的风险因素主要有( )。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性。
艾宾浩斯以自己为被试,采用机械重复记忆的方法,对遗忘规律进行定量研究,据此回答下列问题:实验使用的材料是什么?
最新回复
(
0
)