首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read carefully the following excerpt, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should: 1) Summar
Read carefully the following excerpt, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should: 1) Summar
admin
2022-01-15
60
问题
Read carefully the following excerpt, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should:
1) Summarize the main message of the excerpt, and then
2) Comment on whether it is necessary to go vegetarians or not. You should support yourself with information from the excerpt.
Giving up meat can make our planet better. Whether this is true or not is debated widely. The following are two different opinions. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your view on the issue.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Can Going Vegetarians Save Our Planet?
Many people are surprised to learn that livestock farming is responsible for a high level of green house gas emissions, which are known to cause global warming. One study estimates that the farming of animals causes more emissions (18%) than the world’s entire transport system (13.5%). There are even more interesting statistics about the impact that livestock have on global warming. For example, nitrous oxide is almost 300 times more damaging to the climate than carbon dioxide, and 65% of the total quantity produced comes from livestock. Methane is another gas that causes global warming, and cows and sheep are responsible for 37% of total methane emissions.
However, for most of human history, cattle, sheep and goats have eaten the grass on land that is not suitable for growing crops or grain. By doing this, they convert grass that is inedible into meat and milk. Even today, sheep or goats can be the most efficient way to get food from some land. In a world where more than a billion people do not have enough food to eat, taking this land out of the food production process would create even less food security for many people. Moreover, when land is very dry or hilly, grazing by livestock often causes much less damage to the environment than growing crops.
选项
答案
Can Going Vegetarians Save Our Planet? Whether becoming a vegetarian or meat eater helps better our environment has been ever discussed widely. The excerpt reveals two conflicting ideas. One claims that eating meat or raising livestock has a harmful impact on our natural environment while the other argues that stock farming takes advantage of unproductive land and also provides a solution to food scarcity. It seems that either side makes sense. According to supporters for vegetarians in the excerpt, eating meat means a large number of livestock to be raised. This, with some proven statistics, would result in the increase of carbon emission, consequently leading to global warming. However, long before the Industrial Revolution, meat production had existed, which did not cause the rise of temperature as it does now. In this way, only overgrazing creates many problems, including damage to grass root, carbon emission and maybe deforestation. However, opponents think that farming of animals could create sufficient food and make the best of poor land such as hills or dry land. Compared with the negative effects on the environment by crop growth, animal farming seems to damage less. Admittedly, in land unsuitable to grow crops, it is a good idea to raise livestock to produce more food as well as effectively use the land. However, in fertile land, farming animals may not be a good choice. It runs at the cost of cutting trees to make room for cattle and sheep, which may instead bring more problems to locals. In summary, animal farming in barren land may help produce meat and almost have no damage to the environment but it can increase carbon emission and worsen our environment. So it is a hard choice to make. More factors should be taken into consideration to come up with a final decision.
解析
在准备这一写作任务时,一定要先读所给题目说明:不吃肉是否可以让我们的星球更好。在这一基础上,我们才能对所给短文进行正确的理解。文中提出两种观点,一方面认为吃肉加剧了全球变暖,有数据为证;另一方面则认为吃肉不仅解决食物问题,而且和种植粮食作物相比造成的环境破坏少。因此,所给材料集中的冲突在于吃肉对环境的影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/4vtK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Commutershavea40percentgreaterriskofendingupdivorced,accordingtoauniversitystudy.【C1】_____youarereading
Commutershavea40percentgreaterriskofendingupdivorced,accordingtoauniversitystudy.【C1】_____youarereading
Commutershavea40percentgreaterriskofendingupdivorced,accordingtoauniversitystudy.【C1】_____youarereading
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
随机试题
某4段的流水处理机需要7拍才能完成某一个工作,其预约表如下所示。画出流水线状态转移图。
患者,男,43岁。无明显诱因出现眼睑及下肢浮肿,气喘,乏力。血压142/94mmHg。现症见浮肿,按之凹陷不易恢复,腹胀纳少,面色萎黄,神疲乏力,尿少色清,大便溏,舌质淡,苔白腻,脉沉弱。实验室检查:尿常规蛋白阳性,24小时尿蛋白定量4.8g,血浆总蛋白4
A.药品注册申请B.已有国家标准的药品申请C.新药申请D.进口药品申请E.补充申请境外生产的药品在中国境内上市销售的注册申请()。
A、麦角新碱B、地尔硫革C、丁丙诺啡D、地芬诺酯E、喷他佐辛属于第一类精神药品的是
关于民事诉讼中的公开审判制度,下列哪一选项是错误的?
地籍管理的对象必须是完整的土地区域空间,这体现了地籍资料的()。
根据公司法律制度的规定,下列关于公司因故未成立,相关债权人的请求权利中正确的有()。
某市因实施国务院批准的建设项目,需要对项目覆盖的地区进行搬迁,甲企业自行将位于项目覆盖地区的房产转让给国家,取得收入2000万元,该房地产购买时支付价款1000万元,评估价格为1500万元,则甲企业应纳的土地增值税为()万元。
在某次考试中,小明的语文成绩为80。已知全班语文平均成绩为65,语文成绩的标准差为10。小明语文科目的标准分数是
某块SoundBlaster声卡是8位的,这里的8位指(14)。
最新回复
(
0
)