首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2021-10-20
71
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT _______.
选项
A、political power
B、high fares
C、economic loss
D、indifference
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在最后一段。A、B、D都被提到,只有C的内容未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/48tK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whichofthefollowingsentencesexpressesanopinion?
______you______furtherproblemswithyourprinter,contactyourdealerforadvice.
ThelatePresidentoftheschoolgraduatedfromafamousuniversity.Theunderlinedwordmeans______.
Frequentlysingle-parentchildren______someofthefunctionsthattheabsentadultinthehousewouldhaveserved.
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistentlyF.dramaticG.enhancingH.magnifyingI.mea
A.designsB.energyC.contextsD.generallyE.walkingF.timeG.exposingH.accessI.returnedJ.appealK.unethica
A.dietB.regularlyC.healthyD.commonlyE.reducedF.samplesG.containsH.participatedI.drinkJ.measuredK.av
[A]school[B]numbers[C]emphasize[D]continue[E]significant[F]undoubtedly[G]weak[H]countries[I]invisible[J]ignore[K]unloc
Thecompanyhascapitalized______theerrorofjudgmentmadebyitsbusinesscompetitor.
Listentothefollowingpassage.Altogetherthepassagewillbereadtoyoufourtimes.Duringthefirstreading,whichwillbe
随机试题
设向量a=(2,4,-5),b=(2,3,k),若a与b垂直,则k=____________.
3D傅立叶成像的最主要优点是
PFM的金属热膨胀系数远远大于瓷的热膨胀系数时易产生烤瓷合金在预氧化过程中形成一层氧化膜,该氧化膜与瓷产生的结合力为
对于甲型肝炎的描述,正确的是
喘证的主要临床特征是
以下关于“合法性审查原则”的意义表述正确的有哪些?
身体受到伤害要求赔偿的诉讼时效是( )。
资产净利率的计算公式是()。
世界已进入知识爆炸时代。据不完全统计,全球的知识量每5年翻一番。许多领域的趋于一致并不意味着新知识的减少。任何一个人都不可能完全掌握每一领域在不断更新的知识。随时了解自己研究领域的最新发展动向绝非易事。
Theyhaveofferedmealotofhelp,soIshalldosomethingforthem______.
最新回复
(
0
)