2. 外语
  3. Few people would defend the Victorian attitude to children, but if you were a parent in those days, at least you knew where you

Few people would defend the Victorian attitude to children, but if you were a parent in those days, at least you knew where you

admin2011-06-29  100
问题     Few people would defend the Victorian attitude to children, but if you were a parent in those days, at least you knew where you stood: children were to be seen and not heard. Freud and company did away with all that and parents have been bewildered ever since. The child’s happiness is all-important, the psychologists say, but what about the parents’ happiness? Parents suffer continually from fear and guilt while their children gaily romp about pulling the place apart. A good "old-fashioned" spanking is out of the question: no modern child-rearing manual would permit such barbarity. The trouble is you are not allowed even to shout. Who knows what deep psychological wounds you might inflict? The poor child may never recover from the dreadful traumatic experience. So it is that parents bend over backwards to avoid giving their children complexes which a hundred years ago hadn’t even been heard of. Certainly a child needs love, and a lot of it. But the excessive permissiveness of modern parents is surely doing more harm than good.
    Psychologists have succeeded in undermining parents’ confidence in their own authority. And it hasn’t taken children long to get wind of the fact. In addition to the great modern classics on childcare, there are countless articles in magazines and newspapers. With so much unsolicited advice flying about, mum and dad just don’t know what to do any more. In the end, they do nothing at all. So, from early childhood, the kids are in charge and parents’ lives are regulated according to the needs of heir offspring. When the little dears develop into teenagers, they take complete control. Lax authority over the years makes adolescent rebellion against parents all the more violent. If the young people are going to have a party, for instance, parents are asked to leave the house. Their presence merely spoils the fun. What else can the poor parents do but obey’?
    Children are hardy creatures (far hardier than the psychologists would have us believe) and most of them survive the harmful influence of extreme permissiveness which is the normal condition in the modern household. But a great many do not. The spread of juvenile delinquency in our own age is largely due to parental laxity. Mother, believing that little Johnny can look after himself, is not at home when he returns from school, so little Johnny roams the streets. The dividing-line between permissiveness and sheer negligence is very fine ’indeed.
    The psychologists have much to answer for. They should keep their mouths shut and let parents get on with the job. And if children are knocked about a little bit in the process, it may not really matter too much. At least this will help them to develop vigorous views of their own and give them something positive to react against. Perhaps there’s some truth in the idea that children who have had a surfeit of happiness in their childhood appear like stodgy puddings and fail to make a success of life.
From the last paragraph the conclusion can be drawn that children who enjoy all-important happiness will______
选项 A、soon gain independence from their negligent parents.
B、stay away from the influence of juvenile delinquency.
C、avoid being given uncertain psychological complexes.
D、grow up to be more immature and irresponsible adults.
答案D
解析 题干问：“从最后一段得到的结论是那些完全享有幸福的孩子往往会怎样?”正确选项为D“长大后不成熟而且相当的不负责任”，这个题可从最后一句来判断，并且也可以从第3自然段的归纳得出。而选项A“马上就从他们玩忽职守的父母那里获得独立”，选项B“远离青少年犯罪的影响”，和选项C“避免被给予不确定的心里扭曲”都是原文信息的编造。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/356O777K
0

考博英语

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)