首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the accou
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the accou
admin
2022-10-18
88
问题
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2. 5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2. 5% rate?
(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2. 5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.
选项
A、Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B、Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C、BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D、EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E、Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
答案
C
解析
Let P
0
, P
1
and P
2
be the initial balance, the balance after one year, and the balance after two years.
(1) Since $25 is the exact amount of interest earned in one year by an initial amount of $1,000 earning 2.5 percent annual interest, compounded yearly, it follows that $25 is the total amount of interest earned in slightly less than one year by an initial amount of $1,000 earning 2.5 percent annual interest, compounded daily. However, the total amount of interest earned at the 2 percent rate could be less than $25 (for example, if P
0
= $990, then the interest earned at the 2 percent rate is $10) and the total amount of interest earned at the 2 percent rate could be greater than $25 (for example, if P
0
= $900, then the interest earned at the 2 percent rate is $100); NOT sufficient.
(2) Given that the account was open for exactly three years, then the total amount of interest at the 2 percent rate could be less than the total amount of interest at the 2.5 percent rate (for example, if the balance reached $1,000 a few days after the account was open). On the other hand, the total amount of interest at the 2 percent rate could also be greater than the total amount of interest at the 2.5 percent rate (for example, if the balance reached $1,000 a few days before the account was closed); NOT sufficient.
Given (1) and (2), it follows that the account earned interest at the 2.5 percent rate for slightly less than one year and the account earned interest at the 2 percent rate for slightly more than two years. Therefore, the balances of P
1
and P
2
were reached while the account was earning interest at the 2 percent rate. Since P
0
(1.02) < P
1
and P
1
(1.02) < P
2
(compounding daily for one year produces a greater amount than compounding annually for one year), the values of P
0
, P
1
, and P
2
satisfy the following inequalities.
P
0
< P
0
(1.02) < P
1
< P
1
(1.02) < P
2
< 1,000
Note that the difference 1,000 - P
0
is the total amount of interest earned at the 2 percent rate. Thus, using (2), we wish to determine whether this difference is greater than 25. From P
0
(1.02) < P
1
it follows that P
0
(1.02)
2
< P
1
(1.02), and since P
1
(1.02) < 1,000, we have P
0
(1.02)
2
< 1,000. Therefore, P
0
< 1000/(1.02)
2
, from which we can conclude the following inequality.
1,000-P
0
> 1,000-1000/(1.02)
2
Since 1,000-1000/(1.02)
2
> 25 (see below), it follows that 1,000 - P
0
> 25 and hence the total amount of interest earned at the 2 percent rate is greater than the total amount of interest earned at the 2.5 percent rate.
One way to verify that 1,000 - 1000/(1.02)
2
> 25 is to verify that 1-1/(1.02)
2
>1/40, or equivalently, verify that 1/(1.02)
2
< 39/40, or 40 < 39(1.02)
2
.
Now note that we can obtain this last inequality from 40 < 39(1.04) (because 39 + 39(0.04) is greater than 39 + 1) and 1.04 < (1.02)
2
.
The correct answer is C;
both statements together are sufficient.
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/2ktO777K
本试题收录于:
GMAT QUANTITATIVE题库GMAT分类
0
GMAT QUANTITATIVE
GMAT
相关试题推荐
Spending50minuteswithacellphoneclosetoyourearisenoughtochangebraincellactivityinthepartofthebrainclosest
Todayanyonewillacceptmoneyinexchangeforgoodsandservices.Peopleusemoneytobuyfood,furniture,books,bicyclesand
SpeakerA:IhaveanadmirationforChineseKungFu.BruceLee,JetLiandJackieChanareverypopularinmoviescircle.Speak
Roger:So,howisyournewroommate?Martha:【D1】______Roger:Whathappened?Martha:She’salwaysmakingloudnoisesatmidnig
Ibelieveyouhave()someimportantpointsinthereport.
Isawacarinthedistance,butIcouldn’t______whetheritwasredornot.
______fromadistance,themountainlookslikeanoldman.
Therearemanyolderpeopleintheworldandtherewillbemanymore.Alittle-knownfactisthatover60percentoftheolderp
________thattheymayeventuallyreducetheamountoflaborneededonconstructionsitesby90percent.
Inmakingmarketinvestigation,oneshould______.WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrue?
随机试题
以潜在的侵权人为被保险人所设计的一种责任保险,其保险标的为被保险人对第三人所负的赔偿责任,该保险为哪种产品保险?
A胰岛素B磷脂类C单室脂质体D热敏感性药物E微球逆相蒸发法适合于包封
下列哪项Coombs试验阴性
A.不得采用附赠礼品销售方式B.可以采用附赠药品销售方式C.对药品购买和使用进行指导D.佩戴标明其姓名等内容的胸卡E.不得采用开架自选的销售方式营业时间内在岗的执业药师应()
英国人戴维斯在美国新泽西州和加利福尼亚州均有经常居所,他与中国大华公司有业务往来关系,后双方产生争议,戴维斯发现网络上有出自大华公司对其不良的言论,认为大华公司侵犯了其人格权,关于人格权内容的法律适用,依我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》,下列哪项是正确的?(
关于电力架空线路架设及试验的说法中,正确的有()。
金鱼实际上是一类人工驯养的鲫鱼。大约2000年以前,中国的古人就开始养殖银鲫作为食物和观赏鱼。随着时间的推移,基因突变和人工选择使银鲫身上出现了橙、红、黄等颜色,改变了其沉闷乏味的形象,也造就了我们今天看到的多姿多彩的金鱼。17世纪的时候,金鱼传到欧洲,并
《蛮书》
劳动力商品最重要的特征是
以下选项中非法的字符常量是()。
最新回复
(
0
)