首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
admin
2013-11-30
105
问题
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthrough in science poses a new problem—whether it’ s safe for people to eat them. Experts say that much of the current angst over genetically modified foods is unnecessary. If research and development are allowed to continue, the products will be there for all to appreciate.
New varieties of rice and other crops, resistant to insects and diseases, will have replaced those cultivated today. Farmers will no longer lose substantial proportions of their harvests. The impact of these advances will be felt in the less developed countries. Health benefits will also come from plants genetically engineered to be more balanced nutritionally than those that have evolved through natural selection or been bred by traditional methods.
The potential medical spin-offs from plant biotechnology are considerable. A new generation of more potent vaccines, many against illness for which no vaccines have been available, will be grown in plants such as maize and bananas.
Malnutrition could be banished. Biotechnology can improve efficiency of food production and generate more nourishing crops.
Throughout the world, gardeners, vegetarians, and consumers will benefit from plant varieties resistant to spoilage, foods which reduce our dependence on animals, and cheaper and/or tastier products.
We should not, however, overlook potential hazards in altering our diets by genetic engineering. As with all other applications of science to human welfare, biotechnology is likely to have risks. Mistakes will probably be made.
Nevertheless, any analysis of the new techniques for ferrying genes between plants must surely conclude that they are being applied and controlled more stringently than any technology ever before.
Nearly 25 years ago, when scientists first learned to combine DNA from different sources, commentators warned of the iniquity of "opening Pandora’ s box". Among their horrific forecast were unstoppable epidemics and worldwide pestilence. None of these has come to pass, partly because genetic manipulation has not proved inherently dangerous.
In addition, regulatory committees have been set up to ensure that experiments are conducted in appropriately safe conditions.
The regulators’ task is not simply to allow research to go ahead unless potential hazards are obvious. It is to consider risks that could come to light later. Will a gene, introduced intorape to protect it against virus attack, also make the pollen grains more likely to cause hay fever? All proposals have to survive positive vetting of this sort before they are sanctioned.
Genetic engineering is far more precise—and thus predictable—than the gene movements which occur in nature. When plants fertilize and cross-fertilize in the wild, large numbers of genes are transferred in a haphazard fashion.
Biotechnology allows individual genes to be moved with precision from one plant to another. It is much easier to know how one gene will work in its new setting. The likelihood of unexpected consequences and the margin of error are correspondingly reduced. There is a chance, however remote, that a gene introduced into a particular plant at one time and location might have adverse consequences if it eventually gets into another plant distant in space and time.
Given the astronomical amount of random gene transfer which occurs through the biosphere such extreme caution is unwarranted. I believe most food producers—and eaters—would agree.
Despite the possibility of introduction of a gene into a particular plant at one time and location, the author contends that such extreme caution about genetic technology is unwarranted because______.
选项
A、there are regulatory committees
B、in labs gene ferrying is being applied and controlled stringently
C、genetic engineering is far more precise than the natural gene movement
D、the possibility of such an event is too small
答案
C
解析
从第十一段Genetic engineering is far more precise than the gene movements which occurin nature可直接找出答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/2CU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
女性,40岁。4年前呼吸道感染后出现咳嗽伴胸闷,此后反复发作,伴有喘息,多于呼吸道感染后出现,3天前再次发作。体检:呼吸30次/分,口唇微绀,两肺叩诊过清音,闻及哮鸣音,心率110次/分,律齐。此时行肺功能测定,最可能的表现是
改变病情抗风湿药治疗类风湿关节炎的作用包括
Cultureshockmightbecalledanoccupationaldiseaseofpeoplewhohavebeensuddenlytransplantedabroad.Likemostailments,
Cultureshockmightbecalledanoccupationaldiseaseofpeoplewhohavebeensuddenlytransplantedabroad.Likemostailments,
Despitegrowingnumbersofjoggers,CanadaFitnessSurveysacrossthecountrydemonstratethatCanadiansarelessphysicallyfit
Duringthepast30yearsorso,healthcarehasincreasinglybecomeaformofbusiness.Inaddition,theenvironmentsurroundin
InthispartthereisanessayinChinese,Readitcarefullyandthenwriteasummaryof200wordsinEnglishontheANSWERSHEE
A、Writinganarticle.B、Studyingforaphysicstest.C、Shoppingforshoes.D、Readingamagazine.B女士说如果不是关于物理和期末考试她就不关心,言外之意是物理考
A、Thefamilies.B、Thedoctors.C、Thelawyersandgovernmentofficials.D、Thepatient’smostintimatefriends.C从“usuallysomere
随机试题
我认为你还没有意识到读书的重要性。
朗格汉斯细胞电镜下的主要特征,是细胞质内具有_______颗粒,能够捕获和处理_______,参与_______,是一种_______。
A.火焰反应,火焰显紫色B.供试品的吡啶溶液加铜吡啶试液1滴,即显紫色C.供试品溶液加硝酸,即显红色,渐变为黄色D.制备衍生物测其熔点,应为174℃~178℃E.供试品溶液与三氯化铁试液作用,即显紫色以下
犯罪嫌疑人张某涉嫌重大毒品犯罪被公安机关立案侦查,公安机关根据侦查犯罪的需要,经过严格的批准手续,采取了技术侦查措施。请回答下列问题:对张某采取的技术侦查措施的期限,下列说法正确的是:()
留存收益包括()。
某工业企业为增值税小规模纳税人,原材料采用计划成本核算,A材料计划成本每吨为20元。本期购进A材料6000吨,收到的增值税专用发票上注明的不含税价款总额为102000元,增值税额为17340元。另发生运杂费用1400元,途中保险费用359元。原材料运抵企业
一个公司长期资本结构中债务的数量反映了公司的()。
下列选项我国婚姻法不禁止的是()。
根据以下资料,回答下列问题。2011年利润增长最快的公司(前10名)中,利润比上一年增加最多的公司的利润增加了()亿美元。
和平与发展这两大主题至今一个都没有解决,天下仍不太平。这是因为
最新回复
(
0
)