首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
30
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage? ( )
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/25qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
ItisgoingbesometimebeforeIcanrecovermyfull______(strong).
Inthissixthgradeclassroom,youwouldfind______.Whichyearwouldbeincludedinthe21stCentury?
Thisresearchhasattractedwidecoverageinthe______andhasfeaturedonBBCtelevision’sTomorrow’sWorld.
Isit______youwerebornthatdecidesyournationality?
Accordingtotheauthor,feelingdepressedis______.Whyistheauthorinfavorofcommunicationthroughprintforchildren?
Personalqualitiesarepersonal______ofanindividual.Thoughskillsareimportant,anemployerwillselectnewemployeesbas
Therewillbemorethan900graduatesfromthisuniversitythisyear,______onlyonethirdcouldworkinthestate-runindustry
Americansenjoyfastfoodmainlybecause______.Itcanbeinferredthatchildren______.
A、hourB、honorC、honorD、honestC
Theworld’soceanshavewarmed50percentfasteroverthelast40yearsthanpreviouslythoughtduetoclimatechange,Australia
随机试题
下列各组概念中正确的是()
“天癸至,任脉通,太冲脉盛”的生理基础是
某男,30岁,主诉头痛,为明确病人是否并发颅内出血,作为当班护士,除了观察病人神志的变化外,下列哪项检查最有助于你的临床判断()
下列哪项不是透明软骨的主要分布之处
霍乱弧菌的主要致病物质是()
A、尿蛋白B、尿胆红素C、尿液酸碱度D、尿胆原E、尿肌酐严重进行性肌萎缩,可用哪项检查结果减少()。
刘某系某公司搬运工人,一日随单位汽车往市内运送蔬菜,途中见路上来往妇女较多,就产生歹意,多次用白菜往马路上行走的妇女投掷,寻求刺激,并以此为乐。当汽车行至一大街时,街上行人正匆匆行走,刘某见一妇女特别漂亮,就随手捡起一颗白菜,向该女子掷去,打中该女子的胸部
某公司2016年度资金平均占用额为4500万元,其中不合理部分占15%,预计2017年销售增长率为20%,资金周转速度不变。采用因素分析法预期的2017年度资金需要量为()万元。
求二重积,其中D是x2+y2=1,x=0和y=0。所围成的区域在第一象限部分.
Duringtheconstructionofskyscrapers,cranesareusedto______buildingmaterialstotheupperfloors
最新回复
(
0
)