首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Years before President Bill Clinton came to Washington with his campaign pledge to spend an additional $20,000 million annually
Years before President Bill Clinton came to Washington with his campaign pledge to spend an additional $20,000 million annually
admin
2010-06-11
82
问题
Years before President Bill Clinton came to Washington with his campaign pledge to spend an additional $20,000 million annually on America’s infrastructure "to develop the world’s best communication, transportation, and environmental systems," economists and others were talking about the need to spend more on public works. Their debate has been almost entirely about one question: how much more? Usually overlooked in these in discussions is the real infrastructure dilemma of the 21st century--not how much to spend but how to decide what to build and where to build it.
For several reasons, the old ways of deciding these matters simply do not work anymore. Americans today are far more skeptical about the value of new roads, bridges, and sewage treatment plants especially when they are located in their own. backyards. Their faith that decisions about public works can be safely left in the hands of public officials, engineers, and other technical experts is gone.
Reflecting in 1985 upon the final demise of West way, the proposed highway along Manhattan’s West Side that had been held up for 30 years, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York wrote, "There is a kind of stasis that is beginning to settle into our public life. We cannot reach decisions. Central park could not conceivably be built today as it was when there was enough power in government to make the decision. We don’t have that capacity."
The persistence of the public works pork barrel (地方建设经费)—funding blatantly political projects--has also contributed to public skepticism. In the same year that Moynihan decried the death of Westway, local politicians the $1,800 million Tennessee Tombigbee Waterway, recently described by the Atlanta Journal Constitution as "a broken promise." A classic pork barrel project, the waterway carries only one-tenth the commercial barge traffic that had been projected.
Economists’ debate has neglected the question of how______.
选项
答案
to decide what to build and where to build it
解析
分析题。文章第一段第二句与问题相关:他们的讨论几乎完全围绕一个问题:即增加多少资金?接着作者又指出,可是这些讨论都常常忽视了二十一世纪基础设施建设的真正难题,即不是要投多少,而是要建造什么以及在哪里建造的问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/1xKK777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Somepeoplehavetheage-olddesiretoputthejokeonothers.AccordingtoBoese,manypeoplebelievedthereportofSwissspa
WhichofthefollowingisTRUEaccordingtoPara.1?Whichofthefollowing,ifpresentedasthefirstsentenceofasucceeding
What’stheopinionofeconomistsaboutgoingtocollege?ThetwoHarvardeconomistsnoteintheirstudythat,formuchofthe2
A、Heknowstherouteverywell.B、Heoftengetslost.C、Hedoesn’tknowwherethehotelis.D、Hethinksit’sanexpensivehotel.
A、Economics.B、Englishliterature.C、Greek.D、Psychology.C
Americanhighereducationstandsonthebrinkofchaos.Neverhavesomanyspentsolonglearningsolittle.Thepresentcrisis
Iflifeexpectancywereamarathon,theUnitedStatesisfadingfromthepack.Althougheveryoneislivinglonger,theinhabitan
A、Apetdog.B、Thesonofthecouple.C、Apetcat.D、Theman’syoungerbrother.B本题问“根据对话内容,Max可能是谁”。文中提到的"grandmother"表明Max是
A、Ananalysisofearlypresidentialelections.B、Acomparisonofpoliticaljournals.C、Theuseofcomputersincalculatingelect
Americansocietyisnotnap-friendly.Infact,saysDavidDinges,asleep【B1】______attheUniversityofPennsylvaniaSchoolof
随机试题
某增值税一般纳税人因地震毁损库存材料一批,该批原材料实际成本为20000元。购进时支付的增值税税额为3400元,收回残料价值800元。保险公司赔偿11600元。该批毁损原材料造成的非常损失净额是()元。
事件A,B满足P(A)+P(B)>1,则A与B一定()
基坑经常性排水,排水总量应包括()。
财务报告的核心内容是()。
财政债券是国家为()所发行的一种债券。
位于市区的甲化妆品公司为增值税一般纳税人,2019年4月发生以下经济业务:(1)用生产成本为70000元的350盒A型高档化妆品换取原材料,约定按照A型高档化妆品当月销售平均不含税价格250元/盒进行结算,双方互开增值税专用发票。(2)将A型高档化妆品
具有奖励和告诫性质的公文是()。
节俭属于性格的()特征。
行政裁决是指行政机关或法定授权的组织,依照法律授权,对当事人之间发生的、与行政管理活动密切相关的、与合同无关的:民事纠纷进行审查,并作出裁决的具体行政行为。下列选项中,不属于行政裁决的是()。
假设某程序语言的文法如下:S→a|b|(T)T→TdS|S其中,VT=(a,b,d,(,)};VN={S,T},S是开始符号。考察该文法,句型(Sd(T)dh)是S的一个(28)。其中(29)是最左素短语,(30)是该句型的直接短语。
最新回复
(
0
)