首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
admin
2013-01-24
53
问题
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided that the nation’s real problem is too many immigrants of too many kinds. Faced with a daily onslaught against migrants it may be understandable to give in to populist bigotry; but it is not forgivable.
Take this, for example: "National citizenship is inherently exclusionary." So no foreigners need ever apply for naturalisation, then. And" ... public anxiety about migration ... is usually based on a rational understanding of the value of British citizenship and its~ incompatibility with over-porous borders". Straight from the lexicon of the far right. And best of all: "You can have a welfare state provided that you are a homogenous society with intensely shared values."
These are extracts from an article in the Observer, penned by the liberal intellectual Goodhart, who is just one of several liberal thinkers now vigorously making what they consider a progressive argument against immigration. It goes like this: the more diverse a society, the less likely its citizens are to share common values; the fewer common values, the weaker the support for vital institutions of social solidarity, such as the welfare state and the National Health Service.
There are perfectly good reasons to worry about how we respond to immigration, not least the downward pressure on workers’ wages; the growth of racial inequality; and the exploitation of illegals. But the answer to these problems is not genteel xenophobia, but trade union rights, backed by equality and employment law.
The xenophobes should come clean. Their argument is not about immigration at all. They are liberal Powellites; what really bothers them is race and culture. If today’s immigrants were white people from the old Commonwealth, Goodhart and his friends would say that they pose no threat because they share Anglo-Saxon values.
Unfortunately for liberal Powellites, the real history of the NHS shatters their fundamental case against diversity. The NHS is a world-beating example of the way that ethnic diversity can create social solidarity. Launched by a Welshman, built by Irish: labourers, founded on the skills of Caribbean nurses and Indian doctors, it is now being rescued by an emergency injection of Filipino nurses, refugee ancillaries and antipodean medics. And it remains 100% British.
Virtually all of our public services have depended heavily on immigrants. Powell was forced to admit as much when, as minister for health he advertised for staff in the Caribbean. His new admirers will discover that a rapidly depopulating Europe will have no choice but to embrace diversity.
For the moment, however, the liberal Powellites are gaining support in high places. Their ideas are inspired by the work of the American sociologist Putnam, a Downing Street favourite. He purports to show that dynamic, diverse communities are more fragmented than stable, monoethnic ones. But the policy wonks have forgotten that Putnam’s research was conducted in a society so marked by segregation that even black millionaires still live in gated ghettoes.
The prime minister still seems uneasy on the issue. Last week, he wavered uncertainly between backing his pro-immigration home secretary, and a defensive response to Howard’s goading that the government was in a mess on the topic.
Oddly enough, this is a place in the arena of world politics where the PM does not stand shoulder to shoulder with Bush. The Spanish-speaking former governor of Texas recently announced that he would "regularise" the status of millions of illegal Mexican immigrants who had slipped across the border to work. It’s the kind of massive amnesty that would send the Daily Express into conniptions.
Even more peculiar, the prime minister appears to be ignoring not only Blunkett but also his new best friend, the Labour mayor of London, Livingstone, and Scotland’s first minister, McConnell. London wants more immigrants to keep pace with its booming economy, Scotland wants them to boost its ageing work force..Yet the liberal Powellites still seem prepared to confront a Bush-Blunkett-Livingstone-McConnell axis, because they are scared witless by the far right. They hope that by appeasing racism, they’ll make it go away. But this is a beast with an insatiable appetite.
The French discovered that too late; the thuggish National Front is now France’s second largest party, with one in five likely to vote for them in upcoming local elections. Liberal secularists who joined in the assault on the rights of French Muslims now have to find a convincing explanation for their cowardice, which has also betrayed the freedom of expression of French Jews and Christians.
In Holland, this spinelessness has ended up as straight leftwing racism. The previously liberal Dutch establishment is now pushing an asylum policy so extreme even the Sun was moved to criticise it.
The line up that favours managed migration and diversity--Blunkett, McConnell, Livingstone, Bush and the Sun--share one quality that the PM should envy m6re than any other at present: they are all popular with the public. Maybe the government ought to pay, more heed to this focus group than the ones that see scary foreigners on every street corner.
Perhaps we should also be creating an even more progressive immigration policy, for example offering easier admission to those who will bring their skills to the depopulated regions of the north. The Americans will next year offer more work permits to IT whizzkids from India than ever before; and before the middle of the century, the world’s strongest economy will become its most ethnically diverse. Our own population is still over 92% white; we shouldn’t be duped by anxious faint-hearts into becoming an all-white backwater.
This passage is most probably part of______.
选项
A、an ethnic study
B、a newspaper article
C、a government report
D、a research report
答案
B
解析
本文为报刊文章。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/1raO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThelargestlakeinBritainis______.
HumanitiesDisciplinesInmanypeople’seyes,thehumanitiesdisciplinesseemtobedyingout.However,actually,studentsconti
A"scientistic"viewoflanguagewasdominantamongphilosophersandlinguistswhoaffectedtodevelopascientificanalysisof
Withregardtoitssize,Australiais______countryintheworld.
A、Literature.B、History.C、Economics.D、Psychology.A
Properarrangementofclassroomspaceisimportanttoencouraginginteraction.Today’scorporationshirehumanengineeringspeci
Accordingtolegend,Aesculapiusboretwodaughters,PanaceaandHyegeia,whogaverisetodynastiesofhealersandhygienists.
A、stayawayfrompossibledangerB、showFrance’spowerC、cuttheconnectionbetweenthetwocountriesD、arrestsomeofthetopR
A、wanttoknowaboutyourtemper.B、focusonyourassertiveness.C、careaboutyourteamworkskills.D、doubtaboutyourhonesty.
随机试题
如何检修电磁离合器?
当x>0时,证明
下颌开口型正常的是
下列药物最常应用于治疗冠心病变异型心绞痛发作的是
患者,男,62岁,患2型糖尿病,患者饮食较规律。查血糖7次:空腹血糖6.3mmol/L,早餐后2h血糖11.2mmol/L,中餐前血糖7.3mmol/L,中餐后血糖10.2mmol/L,晚餐前血糖8.0mmol/L,晚餐后血糖11.8mmol/L,凌晨2时
为了能使资金得到最有效的利用,基准收益率应不低于单位资金成本和单位投资的()。
上级若变更或撤销下级机关不适当的决定,应使用()
设α1,α2,α3是三维向量,则对任意常数k,l,向量组α1+kα3,α2+lα3线性无关是向量组α1,α2,α3线性无关的()。
阅读下面材料。回答下列问题。国务院关于2010年度国家科学技术奖励的决定各省、自治区、直辖市人民政府,国务院各部委、各直属机构:为全面
对常兴市Z3家老人院的一项评估显示,爱慈老人院在疾病治疗水平方面受到的评价相当低,而在其他不少方面评价不错。虽然各老人院的规模大致相当,但爱慈老人院医生与住院老人的比率在常兴市的老人院中几乎是最小的。因此,医生数量不足是造成爱慈老人院在疾病治疗水平方面评价
最新回复
(
0
)