首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
admin
2023-01-17
60
问题
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria. Farmers responded that restricting antibiotics in livestock would devastate the industry and significantly raise costs to consumers. We have empirical data that should resolve this debate. Since 1995, Denmark has enforced progressively tighter rules on the use of antibiotics in raising pigs, poultry and other livestock. In the process, it has shown that it’s possible to protect human health without hurting farmers.
Farmers in many countries use antibiotics in two key ways: (1) at full strength to treat sick animals and (2) in low doses to fatten meat-producing livestock or to prevent veterinary illnesses. Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or "sub-therapeutic" dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. The germs that survive are typically those that happen to bear genetic mutations for resisting the antibiotic. They then reproduce and exchange genes with other microbial resisters. Because bacteria are found literally everywhere, resistant strains produced in animals eventually find their way into people as well. You could hardly design a better system for guaranteeing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. As Joshua M. Scharfstein, a principal deputy commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration, put it, "You actually can trace the specific bacteria around and… find that the resistant strains in humans match the resistant strains in the animals." And this science is what led Denmark to stop sub-therapeutic dosing of chickens, pigs and other farm animals. Although the transition unfolded smoothly in the poultry industry, the average weight of pigs fell in the first year. But after Danish farmers started leaving piglets together with their mothers a few weeks longer to bolster their immune systems naturally, the animals’ weights jumped back up, and the number of pigs per litter increased as well. The lesson is that improving animal husbandry—making sure that stalls and cages are properly cleaned and giving animals more room or time to mature—
offsets
the initial negative impact of limiting antibiotic use. Today Danish industry reports that productivity is higher than before. Meanwhile, reports of antibiotic resistance in Danish people are mixed, which shows—as if we needed reminding—that there are no quick fixes.
Of course, the way veterinary antibiotics are used is not the only cause of human drug-resistant infections. Careless use of the drugs in people also contributes to the problem. But agricultural use is still a major contributing factor. Every day brings new evidence that we are in danger of losing effective antibiotic protection against many of the most dangerous bacteria that cause human illness. The technical issues are solvable. Denmark’s example proves that it is possible to cut antibiotic use on farms without triggering financial disaster. In fact, it might provide a competitive advantage. Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense.
What does the word "offset" underlined in Paragraph 4 mean?
选项
A、To serve as a beginning of.
B、To render ineffectively.
C、To set a limit on.
D、To compensate for.
答案
D
解析
offset意为“抵消,补偿”,故D项compel sate“补偿”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/1jcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Peoplegenerallyassumethatwhentheyconsideranotherpersona"friend,"thatpersonalsothinksofthemasafriend,whichme
Americahaslongbeenresistanttoadequatepovertypoliciesbecauseofitsstrongstrainofthinkingthatthepoorareresponsi
Americahaslongbeenresistanttoadequatepovertypoliciesbecauseofitsstrongstrainofthinkingthatthepoorareresponsi
Americahaslongbeenresistanttoadequatepovertypoliciesbecauseofitsstrongstrainofthinkingthatthepoorareresponsi
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
随机试题
正常人眼在视近物时的视觉调节过程包括
碘酒消毒皮肤后,再用75%乙醇脱碘需间隔
下列关于宅基地使用权的说法,正确的是()。
下列不属于我国推行建设工程监理制度的目的的是()。
建筑安装工程费中的人工费包括生产工人的()。
要约的撤销是指对尚未生效的要约阻止其生效的意思表示,撤回须在要约到达受要约人之前或同时到达受要约人。()
某国有资本控股公司与本公司财务经理之妹进行交易,在该经理的全力协调下,交易价格远低于市场平均价格,但该交易仍获得公司董事会全票通过。该交易的法律效力为()。
以下有关注册会计师对财务报表审计责任的陈述中不恰当的是()。
下列作品与作者搭配不正确的是()。
Whatarethesepeopleplanningtodo?
最新回复
(
0
)