首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Despite the brouhaha(骚动)over stolen e-mails from the University of East Anglia, the science of climate change is well enough est
Despite the brouhaha(骚动)over stolen e-mails from the University of East Anglia, the science of climate change is well enough est
admin
2014-09-30
73
问题
Despite the brouhaha(骚动)over stolen e-mails from the University of East Anglia, the science of climate change is well enough established by now that we can move on to the essential question: what’s the damage going to be?
The total bill, if emissions are left unchecked, could reach 20 percent of annual per capita income, says Nicholas Stern, the British economist who led an influential Whitehall-sponsored study. William Nordhaus, a Yale economist, puts his "best guess" at 2. 5 percent of yearly global GDP. And according to Dutch economist Richard Tol, the economic impact of a century’s worth of climate change is "relatively small" and "comparable to the impact of one or two years of economic growth. "
These estimates aren’t just different—they’re different by an order of magnitude. And while some might dismiss the cost estimates as mere intellectual exercises, they’re intellectual exercises with real impact. The Copenhagen meeting may be a bust, but countries from the United States to China are individually considering cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes, and other policies aimed at curtailing greenhouse gases. To be effective, a tax or cap-and-trade charge would have to force today’s emitters to pay the true "social cost of carbon"—in other words, the amount of damage a ton of carbon will cause in the coming centuries.
Figuring out what that cost is, however, is no simple task. That’s largely because most of the bill won’t come due for many decades. A ton of carbon dioxide emitted today will linger in the air for anywhere from one to five centuries. Virtually every cost study shows that, even if economic growth continues apace(快速地)and there’s no effort to slash emissions, the damage from climate change will be negligible until at least 2075. It could take 100 years before we see noticeably negative effects, and even more before we need to launch massive construction projects to mitigate(减轻)the damage.
What can we learn about the present climate change?
选项
A、Its damage is exaggerated to some extent.
B、Actions should be taken the moment people realize it.
C、Measures should be taken immediately to deal with it.
D、The negative effect will not be significant in this century.
答案
D
解析
综合理解题。根据定位句可知,气候变化带来的影响至少要到2075年才会显现,而显著的负面影响在100年之后才能够看到,更多年后我们才会发起大规模建设项目来减轻这种损失。故D)“本世纪负面影响都不会很明显”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/1Nv7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、It’sverylarge.B、Peopletherearegoodatchess.C、It’sfarawayfromhere.D、Peopleareveryrich.B
A、Ithasbeencanceled.B、Itislateonceagain.C、Itleavesevery30minutes.D、Itisnotclearwhenitleaves.D
A、Publicserviceads.B、Healthproblems.C、Commercialads.D、Socialregulations.A
Mendofarmorehouseworkthantheyaregivencreditfor,accordingtoresearchthatclaimswomendonotnoticebecausetheirma
Tensofthousandsofthepoorestpart-timestudentsaretogetextramoneytohelppayuniversityfeesandmeetrisinglivingco
A、Atanewspaper.B、Inthegovernment.C、Inaconstructionfirm.D、Inaprivatecompany.B选项表明,本题考查工作地点,由女士提到的Istarteditwith
A、Sheischeerful.B、Shehasnothing.C、Shefeelsbored.D、Sheisspecial.C结合男士所说的What’sthematterwithyou?及女士所说的I’mjustab
Researchonfriendshiphasestablishedanumberoffacts,someinteresting,someevenuseful.Didyouknowthattheaveragestud
A、In621.B、In1621.C、In1631.D、In1641.B对话中男士问Whenwasitfirstcelebrated?,女士回答说In1621,由此可知,答案为[B]。
A、Sheisgoingtohavedinnerwiththeman.B、Sheisgoingbackhomeforherparents’anniversary.C、Sheisgoingtovisitherf
随机试题
糖皮质激素能抑制炎症细胞的迁移和活化、控制哮喘发作;可是临床应该慎用的品种是
直接固位体的作用是
会计凭证保管的内容包括( )。
基金销售机构应当通过()来保障基金销售适用性在基金销售各个业务环节的实施。
下列属于无形市场的是()。
短期融资券筹资的缺点不包括()。
消费者的()是指消费者在自主选择商品或服务时,有权进行比较、鉴别和挑选。
“爱屋及乌”这个成语中涉及的迁移类型是
关于文件的说法,正确的是(32)。
下面属于白盒测试方法的是
最新回复
(
0
)