2. 考研
  3. Is it possible that the ideas we have today about ownership and property rights have been so universal in the human mind that it

Is it possible that the ideas we have today about ownership and property rights have been so universal in the human mind that it

admin2011-03-14  15
问题      Is it possible that the ideas we have today about ownership and property rights have been so universal in the human mind that it is truly as if they had sprung from the mind of God? By no means. The idea of owning and property emerged in the mists of unrecorded history. The ancient Jews, for one, had a very different outlook on property and ownership, viewing it as something much more temporary and tentative than we do.
     The ideas we have in America about the private ownership of productive property as a natural and universal right of mankind, perhaps of divine origin, are by no means universal and must be viewed as an invention of man rather than an order of God. Of course, we are completely trained to accept the idea of ownership of the earth and its products, raw and transformed. It seems not at all strange; in fact, it is quite difficult to imagine a society without such arrangements. If someone, some individual, didn’t own that plot of land, that house, that factory, that machine, that tower of wheat, how would we function? What would the rules be? Whom would we buy from and how would we sell?
     It is important to acknowledge a significant difference between achieving ownership simply by taking or claiming property and owning what we tend to call the "fruit of labor". If I, alone or together with my family, work on the land and raise crops, or if I make something useful out of natural material, it seems reasonable and fair to claim that the crops or the objects belong to me or my family, are my property, at least in the sense that I have first claim on them. Hardly anyone would dispute that. In fact, some of the early radical workingmen’s movements made (an ownership) claim on those very grounds. As industrial organization became more complex, however, such issues became vastly more intricate. It must be clear that in modern society the social heritage of knowledge and technology and the social organization of manufacture and exchange account for far more of the productivity of industry and the value of what is produced than can be accounted for by the labor of any number of individuals. Hardly any person can now point and say, "That--that right there--is the fruit of my labor." We can say, as a society, as a nation--as a world, really--that what is produced is the fruit of our labor, the product of the whole society as a collectivity.
     We have to recognize that the right of private individual ownership of property is man-made and constantly dependent on the extent to which those without property believe that the owner can make his claim stick.
We learn by inference that private property may
选项 A、be viewed as a design of inventive powers.
B、be treated as a discovery of our ancestors.
C、serve as the universal rule of transactions.
D、function as the basis of market economy.
答案D
解析 推论题。文章第二段后半部分指出：很难设想没有所有权概念的社会是什么样；如果某个人不享有土地、房屋、工厂、机器、粮仓，我们如何行使职权?社会规则又会是怎样呢?我们从谁那里购物，又如何销售呢?由此可以推知，私有权是交易的基础。这与D的意思相符。文中是说“它应该被看成是人类的发明”，这是明确指出的，所以A和B不对；C不合逻辑，私有财产不可能充当法则。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/1Msa777K
本试题收录于： MBA联考（英语）题库专业硕士分类
0

MBA联考（英语）

专业硕士

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)