首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2012-02-02
89
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Griven the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions. (253 words)
In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is______.
选项
A、wrong
B、oversimplified
C、misleading
D、unclear
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/1Cna777K
本试题收录于:
艺术硕士(艺术基础)题库专业硕士分类
0
艺术硕士(艺术基础)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Thefactthatblindpeoplecan"see"thingsusingotherpartsoftheirbodiesapartfromtheireyesmayhelpustounderstando
AskmostpeoplehowtheydefinetheAmericanDreamandchancesarethey’llsay,"Success."Thedreamofindividualopportunity
Ifyouknowexactlywhatyouwant,thebestroutetoajobistogetspecializedtraining.Arecentsurveyshowsthatcompanies
ItcameassomethingofasurprisewhenDiana,PrincessofWales,madeatriptoAngolain1997,tosupporttheRedCross’scamp
Americansarepoundoftheirvarietyandindividuality,yettheyloveandrespectfewthingsmorethanauniform,whetheritis;
MozartwasborninwhatisnowcalledAustri,but,atthattime,itwaspartoftheHolyRomanEmpire.Hewasbaptizedthedaya
Everyartistknowsinhisheartthatheissayingsomethingtothepublic.Notonlydoeshewanttosayitwell,buthewantsit
Everyartistknowsinhisheartthatheissayingsomethingtothepublic.Notonlydoeshewanttosayitwell,buthewantsit
Humanityusesalittlelessthanhalfthewateravailableworldwide.Yetoccurrencesofshortagesanddroughts(干旱)arecausing
Humanityusesalittlelessthanhalfthewateravailableworldwide.Yetoccurrencesofshortagesanddroughts(干旱)arecausing
随机试题
表达式4+5\6*7/8Mod9的值是()。
重度贫血的血红蛋白浓度是
男性,50岁,间断腹痛、腹泻20余年,加重3个月,大便4~5次/天。食欲缺乏,体重下降。化验便隐血(±~+),有脓细胞、红细胞。血Hb104g/L确诊最佳手段
男性,54岁,近1个月来每天午睡或夜间1点发生胸骨后压迫性疼痛,每次持续20分钟,含硝酸甘油5分钟缓解,临床诊断变异性心绞痛能与急性心肌梗死鉴别的辅助检查是
下列哪种肠梗阻最易发生绞窄
A、癌肉瘤B、成熟性畸胎瘤C、腺癌D、平滑肌肉瘤E、乳头状瘤含有两个以上胚层的多种成分良性肿瘤
一、注意事项1.本题本由给定资料与作答要求两部分构成。二、给定资料1.2012年2月20日23时30分许,鞍钢重型机械有限责任公司铸钢厂发生喷爆事故,当场致10人死亡、3人失踪、17人受伤。截至21日12时,搜救人员已经找到3名失踪者遗体,该起事故死
我国共有5万多公里的铁路,承担着53%的客运量和70%的货运量,铁路运力紧张的矛盾十分突出。改造既有铁路线路,提高列车的运行速度,就成了现实的选择。如果下列哪项为真,则上述的论证就要大大削弱?
2022年3月4日,全球首套千吨级()加氢制汽油示范装置在山东邹城工业园区开车成功。
Heisa(n)______characterwholikeswearingaberetanddarkglasses.
最新回复
(
0
)