首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2012-02-02
70
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Griven the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions. (253 words)
In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is______.
选项
A、wrong
B、oversimplified
C、misleading
D、unclear
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/1Cna777K
本试题收录于:
艺术硕士(艺术基础)题库专业硕士分类
0
艺术硕士(艺术基础)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Butthesuccessofscience,bothitsintellectualexcitementanditspracticalapplication,dependsupontheself-correctingc
IntheUnitedStates,itisimportanttobeontime,orpunctual,foranappointment,aclass,ameeting,etc.However,thismay
Happinesscanbedescribedasapositivemoodandapleasantstateofmind.Accordingtorecentinvestigations,sixtytoseventy
Attentiontodetailissomethingeveryonecanandshoulddo—especiallyinatightjobmarket.BobCrossley,ahuman-resourcesex
Ifyouknowexactlywhatyouwant,thebestroutetoajobistogetspecializedtraining.Arecentsurveyshowsthatcompanies
In1985whenaJapanAirLines(JAL)jetcrashed,itspresident,YasumotoTakagi,calledeachvictim’sfamilytoapologize,and
ItcameassomethingofasurprisewhenDiana,PrincessofWales,madeatriptoAngolain1997,tosupporttheRedCross’scamp
Humanityusesalittlelessthanhalfthewateravailableworldwide.Yetoccurrencesofshortagesanddroughts(干旱)arecausing
Theclocktowerlooksoutovera38一hectarecampusgracedbyanornamentallakeandapillaredcentralhall.Addalittleivyand
Humanityusesalittlelessthanhalfthewateravailableworldwide.Yetoccurrencesofshortagesanddroughts(干旱)arecausing
随机试题
26岁,初产妇。孕36周,未进行产前检查,诉下肢水肿半个月,头痛3日。今晨出现视物不清,头痛加重,呕吐1次,尿蛋白(++)。血压如为145/98mmHg,本例可能的诊断是
长于升阳止泻而治疗湿热泻痢、脾虚泄泻的药物是
专利权的客体包括( )。
目前我国项目管理中最薄弱的工作环节是( )。
以下各项中不属于衡量一个人或一个家庭的财务是否安全的指标的是()。
下列风险控制对策中,属于转移风险的有()。
襄阳是()的故乡。
下列关于法律责任的表述中,正确的是()。
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Itisbettertobeamemberofagroupthantobetheleaderofagroup.
Oneafternoonrecently,twounrelatedfriendscalledtotellmethat,well,theirmarriages【B1】______.Onewasleavinghiswife
最新回复
(
0
)