首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
43
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______. ( )
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/15qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
EdmundHalleyfiguredouttheorbitof______.Thispassageingeneralisabout______.
Somepeoplethinkthemoreexpensiveaproductis,thebetteritwillbe.(但事实并非如此).
Don’tworry,Ihavealready______them______thedecision.
WhatwasE.B.White?Whatwastheauthor’spurposeforwritingchildren’sbooks?
Forthispartyouareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:TheLifeontheInternet.Youshouldwritenoless
Incasehe______beforeIgetback,pleaseaskhimtowait.
Justasnotwowordsaretrulysynonymous______notwodifferentexpressionscanmeanexactlythesamething.
Theauthorsayschildreninthecityseldomwenttothewoodsandthefieldsbecause______.Intheauthor’sopinion,youngpeo
A、honestB、chestC、harvestD、forestB画线部分读[e],其他选项的画线部分读[i]
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
随机试题
以布衣身份流落江湖的刘过是()
长度为1字节的二进制数,若采用补码表示,且由5个“1”和3个“0”组成,则可表示的最小十进制整数为________________。
孕35周初产妇,重度子痫前期,患者突发腹痛,4小时后胎心消失,宫底明显升高,子宫强硬,有压痛,宫缩间歇子宫不完全放松,重度贫血貌,阴道少量流血,宫口开l指,头先露,下列何项处理最佳
根据《侵权责任法》第56条规定:“因抢救生命垂危的患者等紧急情况,不能取得患者或者其近亲属意见的,经医疗机构负责人或者授权的负责人批准,可以立即实施相应的医疗措施。”,该条意在强调了哪项权利的保护具有一定程度的优先性:
环境影响工程分析的重点是( )。
某学校宿舍长度40m,宽度13m,建筑层数6层,建筑高度21m,设有室内消火栓系统。宿舍楼每层设置15间宿舍,每间宿舍学生人数为4人。每层中间沿长度方向设2m宽的走道。该楼每层灭火器布置做法中,符合现行国家标准《建筑灭火器配置设计规范》GB50140要求
业主不得违反法律、法规以及管理规约,将住宅改变为经营性用房。业主将住宅改变为经营性用房的,应当()。
某商场销售A、B两种商品,A商品的零售价为15元/件,B商品的零售价为10元/件,为了提高销量,该商场策划了促销活动如下:(1)购买A种商品满100件即可享受批发价,批发价为10元/件。购买B种商品满160件即可享受批发价,批发价为5元/件。
2016年4月15日是首个全民国家安全教育日,习近平总书记再次强调国家安全是“头等大事”。通过成立一个机构、构建一个法律体系、讲清一个问题、抓牢一个落脚点,“头等大事”得到全面落实。下列有关说法错误的是:
下列选项中只能由公民享有的人格权是()。
最新回复
(
0
)