首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A =Section A B =Section B C =Section C Section A Engineering students are supposed to be practically and rationally
A =Section A B =Section B C =Section C Section A Engineering students are supposed to be practically and rationally
admin
2012-01-20
70
问题
A =Section A B =Section B C =Section C
Section A
Engineering students are supposed to be practically and rationally personified, but when it comes to my college education I am an idealist and a fool. In high school I wanted to be an electrical engineer and, of course, any sensible student with my aims would have chosen a college with a large engineering department, prestigious reputation and lots of fancy labs and research equipment. But that’s not what I did.
I chose to study engineering at a small liberal-arts university that doesn’t even offer a major in electrical engineering. Obviously, this was not a practical choice; I came here for more noble reasons. I wanted a broad education that would provide me with flexibility and a value system to guide me in my career. I wanted to open my eyes and expand my vision by interacting with people who weren’t studying science or engineering. My parents, teachers and other adults commended me for such a prudent choice. They told me I was wise and mature beyond my 18 years, and I believed them.
I headed off to college being sure I was going to have an advantage over these students who went to the big engineering "factories" where they didn’t care if you had values or were flexible. I was going to be a complete engineer: technical genius and sensitive humanist all in one.
Now I’m not so sure. Somewhere along the line my lofty ideals smacked into reality, as all naive visions eventually do. After three years of struggling to balance math, physics and engineering courses with the humanities courses of my core, I have learned there are reasons why few engineering students try to combine engineering with a broad liberal curriculum in college.
Section B
The reality that has blocked my breezy path to stereotype smasher is that engineering and the liberal arts simply don’t mix as easily as I assumed in high school. Individually they shape a person in very different ways; together they threaten to confuse. The struggle to reconcile the two disciplines is difficult.
Students who pursue more traditional liberal arts degrees don’t experience the dichotomy between major and core studies that I do. English or psychology majors find related subjects in almost any of their core courses. They can apply much of what they learn in "Chaucer and His Age" or "Personality Theories" to questions raised in "American Foreign Policy" or "Religions of the World".
But I rarely find that my ability to analyze circuits by LaPlace transforms is applicable to the discussions held in my religion or history courses. What I contribute is almost always something learned in another core class, not in the science building. On the rare occasions when I do speak from my knowledge of engineering, there is a language barrier. I can’t talk mathematics to the people in my core classes because most don’t understand it. They force me to deliver a diluted and popularized version of my point that often fails to convey the impact I think it should. It’s like telling a joke to someone who doesn’t get it. You say the punch line and he looks dumbly at you, waiting for more. It’s frustrating.
Not only do engineering and humanities subjects not overlap, but each discipline demands that I think in separate modes. When I walk into a core classroom I am expected to look at many different aspects of existence from a single point of view, such as ethical theory or Romantic poetry. When I enter an electronics laboratory I am expected to examine one thing, such as the characteristics of the ideal transformer, from several different angles, such as the laws of magnetic induction or the perspective of practical design. It feels different in the classroom than in the lab.
The differences follow me out of the classroom. When I sit back in the recliner in my room to read a novel for "British Literature", I open my mind to allow associations between new knowledge and old. But when it is time to work through a few problems for "Electromagnetic Theory", I sit down at my desk on a hard wooden chair and shut out all of my thoughts except those that will help me find the answers.
Section C
The Two Cultures. The essential approach of each discipline can be captured in a metaphor. Imagine how each would use a spotlight to explore a theatrical stage. The humanities would use one colored filter and point the light all over the stage. Engineering would focus a tight beam on one particular actor and use the entire spectrum of colored filters.
The gap between the two cultures of science and humanities is a common theme. But the engineer has even less in common with the humanities than the scientist does. The scientist at least shares the humanist’s ideal of knowledge for its own sake: the unimpeachable position of pure theory. Engineers are denied even this because they are explicitly concerned with using knowledge to fulfill our needs and purposes, both glorious and mundane. There is no pure theory in engineering. There is only what works.
Many engineering students avoid the conflict between their major and their core by placing less emphasis on courses outside their major. They train their thinking to be most effective at solving well-defined problems and muddle through the foggy issues in their core courses as best they can. I am stubborn enough to believe I can learn to think more freely and still be an effective engineer, and that I can be technically honed and still be a human being.
But I know I can’t smash all the stereotypes; I have acquired some of the prejudices they are based on. My writing professor urges me to be less rational. My religion professor reminds me that technology cannot solve all our problems, as much as I would like it to.
As I was preparing last spring to register for classes this fall, I saw that I could be spending more time in the lab than ever during my senior year. Suddenly I wanted out. I swapped my minors in electrical engineering and computer science for a degree in physics, the most I could do without postponing my graduation.
I was reluctant to switch, and someday I may return to engineering. But for now I need to stay closer to the humanities of my core so that I do not abandon part of myself before I know who I really am.
选项
A、
B、
C、
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/11Xd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
EvenIntelligentPeopleCanFail1Thestrikingthingabouttheinnovatorswhosucceededinmakingourmodernworldishow
Ticketsarelimitedandwillbeallocatedtothosewhoapplyfirst.
TheBeginningofAmericanLiteratureAmericanhasalwaysbeenalandofbeginnings.【C1】______Europeans"discovered"America
TheBeginningofAmericanLiteratureAmericanhasalwaysbeenalandofbeginnings.【C1】______Europeans"discovered"America
SchoolLunchResearchhasshownthatoverhalfthechildreninBritainwhotaketheirownlunchestoschooldonoteat【C1】
Whichonecouldbethebesttitleofthearticle?Teenagersandadultshavehada50%betterchanceofnotdevelopingtoothdec
______islocatedintheheartofGreenwichVillage?______providesaccommodationforstudents?
Whatshouldonedoifhewantstoworkmoreefficientlyathislowpointinthemorning?
In1490orso,themainprogressmentionedinthispassagewas______.TheGerman,AugustsSiebe,inventedthe"hard-hatsuit"
Thepassengergotthenon-smokingsection.
随机试题
A.奔马律B.第一心音C.第二心音D.舒张期滚筒样杂音E.全舒张期递减型杂音韵律酷似马奔跑时马蹄触地发出的声音称为
A.低温干燥B.蒸透心,敞开低温干燥C.发汗后再晒干或烘干D.干燥过程中要时时搓揉,使皮、肉紧贴E.阴干玄参在采收加工时应()。
某女性病人,50岁。因腹痛、寒战高热、恶心呕吐及黄疸2天入院。查体:T40℃、P120次/分、R30次/分,BP90/50mmHg,表情淡漠,剑突下压痛明显,白细胞55.0×109/L,诊断为急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎、休克。此病人属于哪一类休克
材料一(案情):孙某与村委会达成在该村采砂的协议,期限为5年。孙某向甲市乙县国土资源局申请采矿许可,该局向孙某发放采矿许可证,载明采矿的有效期为2年,至2015年10月20日止。2015年10月15日,乙县国土资源局通知孙某,根据甲市国土资源局日
随着不确定因素变化百分率取值的不同,()。
【背景资料】某中型防洪工程由政府投资兴建。项目法人委托某招标代理公司代理施工招标。招标代理公司依据有关规定确定该项目采用公开招标方式招标,招标公告在当地政府规定的招标信息网上发布,招标文件中规定:投标担保可采用投标保证金或投标保函方式。评标方法
审核凭证的目的是为了防止凭证填制过程错误发生和舞弊行为。记账凭证填制完毕后,必须由审核人员对制单员所填制的记账凭证进行审核方能登记入账。 ( )
下列属于期货市场在宏观经济中的作用的是()。
下列关于项目投资决策的表述中,正确的是()。(2009年新)
企业采取宽松的营运资本持有政策,产生的结果是()。
最新回复
(
0
)