首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2010-03-25
72
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly. all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investors -- mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans -- all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a Combined banking and currency crisis: a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge, inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference -- and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong; now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The International Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery -- and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all -- as proof that its policy recommendations were right. Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia- which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls -- also seems to be on the mend. Malaysia’s Prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news -- even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance Of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform -- whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no more money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worst, they were like medieval physicians who. prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korean industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
According to the passage, which of the following is NOT the writer’s opinion?
选项
A、Countries paid a heavy price for whichever measure taken.
B、Countries all found themselves in an economic dilemma.
C、Withdrawal of foreign capital resulted in the crisis.
D、Most governments chose one of the two options.
答案
D
解析
这道题目要求考生区分事实与观点。A、B、C项均为作者的观点,在第二、三段中可以找到。D项指的是一个事实。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/rEqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Thetermhomeschoolingorhometuition,asitiscalledinEngland,meanseducatingchildrenathomeorinplacesotherthana【
Actually,though,America,the"landofimmigrants",hasalwayshadpeopleofmanydifferentnationalitiesandlanguages.The19
PopstarstodayenjoyastyleoflivingwhichwasoncetheprerogativeonlyofRoyalty.Wherevertheygo,peopleturnoutinthe
ThefoundersoftheRepublicviewedtheirrevolutionprimarilyinpoliticalratherthaneconomicorsocialterms.Andtheytalke
A、Thelatestcomputertechnology.B、Theorganizingofanexhibition.C、Thepurchasingofsomeequipment.D、Thedramaticchanges
Mostofusaretaughttopayattentiontowhatissaid—thewords.Wordsdoprovideuswithsomeinformation,butmeaningsarede
A、Theweightofanobjectontheearth’ssurface.B、Thepowerofattractionbetweentwoobjects.C、Thenaturalbeautyofanobje
A、NowAmericanmencanlivefiveyearslongerthanexpected.B、AnordinaryAmericanwomanlivesahappierlife.C、InAmerica,th
A、Thebillbecomeslawimmediately.B、Thebillcan’tbecomelawunlessthewholeprocessbeginsagain.C、Lawmakersmustreviewt
Modernintelligencetestingbeganin【B1】______.FrenchpsychologistBinetbasedhistestonthetheorythatintelligenceincreas
随机试题
屋外配电装置软导体选择,请选出条件正确的。软导体截面选择和校验为()。
格式条款的解释应坚持的原则有()
溶血反应主要是用来检测
《人民币银行结算账户管理办法》规定,存款人不得发生的行为包括()。
生漆
2010年10月,甲企业接到一份服装加工的订单,由于资金不足,甲企业与提供原材料的乙公司签订合同,以本企业所有的一辆奔驰轿车(价值80万元)作抵押,为应付的50万元原材料货款提供担保。双方在合同中约定:如甲企业到期不能支付货款,则该奔驰车归乙公司所有。由于
防止遗忘最根本的方法是________。
根据以下资料,回答下题。根据所给资料,下列说法中正确的是:
将强化分为直接强化、替代性强化、自我强化的心理学家是()
请在当前状态下,从第1张幻灯片开始放映,从第1张幻灯片到第3张幻灯片进行排练计时,时间(秒)分别为4、10、6,在第4张幻灯片放映结束,并保留本次的排练计时
最新回复
(
0
)