首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
71
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
It can be inferred from the physical phenomenon that______ ______.
选项
A、the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful
B、the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate
C、electromagnetic fields may affect health
D、only more powerful radiation can knock electrons out of the human body
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。根据题干中的physical phenomenon将本题出处定位于第四段第一句。本句指出,争辩的中心就是一个简单又容易理解的物理现象:当电流通过电线时,会产生电磁场,对周围事物施加一种力。第二句指出,多年来,科学家们都不认可这种力会产生危害,主要是因为它们太微弱了,故答案为[A]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/aaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
转基因作物
grounding
()referstothestudyofsocialaspectsoflanguageanditsrelationwithsociety.
Shehadastrong______togiveatalkaboutherexperiences,becauseshedidn’tlikethelimelight.
Thecomingoftherunwaysinthe1830’s______oursocietyandeconomiclife.
ThenewtechnologicalrevolutioninAmericannewspapershasbroughtincrease______,awiderrangeofpublicationsandanexpans
Atseveno’clockeachmorningabellsoundsintheredbrickbuildingsonthesteepbankoftheHudsonRiveratOssining,NewYo
Generouspublicfundingofbasicsciencewould______considerablebenefitsforthecountry’shealth,wealthandsecurity.
Asadefenseagainstair-pollutiondamage,manyplantsandanimals______asubstancetoabsorbharmfulchemicals.
________toleadisknowntodamagethebrainsofyoungchildren.
随机试题
如何检修后尾灯不亮?
由花生四稀酸衍生的血管活性介质包括
患者36岁女性,因半年来右上后牙龈发现小疱,曾肿痛2次,流出少许咸液,要求诊治,必要的一项检查是
结核性胸膜炎胸腔穿刺抽液,每次抽液量最多不超过()
下列关于动产质押实现方式的论述中,不正确的是()。
钻孔灌注桩单排桩桩位偏差不得大于()mm。
在财政直接支付方式下,事业单位下年度恢复额度时无需进行账务处理。()
在网络消费时代的_________下,为取得读者的青睐和信任,网络文学往往会_________传统文学高贵的面具,不断地调整自我表达和呈现的_________,甚至将读者纳入互为平等的内部,通过特定的网络话语,在形式上真正实现与读者进行对话。填入划横线部分
观:看
开平矿务局
最新回复
(
0
)