首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
admin
2017-09-04
63
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drink. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad or worse than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer—alcoholism.
But wait, we’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down abolished by an amendment to the Constitution (the 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors". Without any more liquor, people could not drink it, and if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunkenness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks of getting it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican Borders. Drinkers were lucky to know of an illegal bar that served Mexican or Canadian liquor. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever—often poisoned alcohol.
On December 5, 1933, they repealed prohibition by ratifying the 21st Amendment to the Constitution.
When enacting the prohibition laws, people________.
选项
A、lived in fear of the law
B、were willing to risk of arresting for the pleasure of liquor
C、recklessly endangered their communities
D、were respectful of the legal sanctions placed on them
答案
B
解析
由第三段首句:“Because,law or no law,millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks of getting it.”可知,即使颁布了禁酒令,可是人们照样我行我素敢于冒险。因此正确答案为B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/MviC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Pickoutfiveappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorresp
IcanclearlyrememberthefirsttimeImetMr.Andrews,myoldheadmaster,【21】thatwasovertwentyyearsago.Duringthewar,I
IcanclearlyrememberthefirsttimeImetMr.Andrews,myoldheadmaster,【21】thatwasovertwentyyearsago.Duringthewar,I
OneBritishschoolisfindingthatallowingchildrentolistentomusicoreventohavetheTVonwhilestudyingishelpingimpr
Thereislittlewecandoaboutit,_____?
Alittleboyinvitedhismothertoattendhisschool’sfirstteacher-parentmeeting.Tothelittleboy’s【21】,shesaidshewould
Smallincomeshavebroughtdownthebirth______.
InBritain,peoplehavedifferentattitudestothepolice.Mostpeoplegenerally【C1】______themandthejobtheydo—althoughther
随机试题
慎独
实践是检验真理的唯一标准。这是因为【】
下列不属于展卖这种方式的优点的是:()。
公路工程施工招标投标活动中如果采用抽签、摇号等博彩性方式进行资格审查。是违背了()原则。
期货公司对董事给予处分的,应自作出决定之日起3个工作日内向中国证监会派出机构报告。()
()是指证券交易所、期货交易所、证券公司、期货经纪公司的从业人员,证券业协会、期货业协会或者证券期货监管管理部门的工作人员,故意提供虚假信息或者伪造、变造、销毁交易记录,诱骗投资者买卖证券、期货合约,造成严重后果的行为。
下列作品与流派对应关系不正确的是()。
单位请专家来对员工进行理论知识的培训,培训前报名人数偏少,但培训当天出席人数却陡增。导致原定教室不足以容纳。你询问未报名人员可否退场。但他们都说希望参加,你怎么办?
对格式刷功能说法正确的是()。
RaisingtheMinimumWageReducesPovertyA)Onefunnypartofwatchingjournalistscovertheminimumwagedebateisthatthe
最新回复
(
0
)