首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
admin
2020-03-31
60
问题
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is essentially the Darwinian argument that extinction results from the inexorable process of so-called "natural selection" in which stronger species survive while weaker ones do not. Moreover, we humans are not exempt from the process. Accordingly, if we see fit to eradicate other species in order to facilitate our survival, then to be it. We are only behaving as animals must, Darwin would no doubt assert.
[B] As I see it, there are three fundamental arguments for imposing on ourselves at least some responsibility to preserve endangered species, The first has to do culpability. According to this argument, to the extent that endangerment is the result of anthropogenic evenis such as clear-cutting of forests or polluting of lakes and streams, we humans have a duty to take affirmative measures to protect the species whose survival we’ve placed in jeopardy.
[C] The second argument, and the one that I find most compelling, is an appeal to logic over emotion. It is a scientific fact that thousands of animal species become extinct every year. Many such extinctions are due to natural forces, while others are due to anthropogenic factors. In any event it is far beyond our ability to save them all. By what standard, then, should we decide which species are worth saving and which ones are out? In my observation, we tend to favor animals with human-like physical characteristics and behaviors. This preference is understandablei after all, dolphins are far more endearing than bugs. But there is no logical justification for such a standard. Accordingly, what makes more sense is to decide based on our own economic self-interest. In other words, the more money and jobs it would cost to save a certain species, the lower priority we should place on doing so.
[D] What are the limits of our duty to save endangered species from extinction? The statement raises a variety of issues about morality, conscience, self-preservation and economics. On balance, however, I fundamentally agree with the notion that humans need not make "extraordinary" efforts—at the expense of money and job— to ensure the preservation of any endangered species.
[E] We should appeal to self-preservation. The animal kingdom is an intricate matrix of interdependent relationships, in which each species depends on many others for its survival. Severing certain relationships, such as that between a predator and its natural prey, can set into motion a series of extinctions that ultimately might endanger our own survival as a species. While this claim might sound far-fetched to some, environmental experts assure us that in the long run it is a very real possibility.
[F] The issue of endangered-species protection is a complex one, requiring subjective judgments about moral duty and the comparative value of various life-forms. Thus, there are no easy or certain answers. Yet it is for this very reason I agree that economic self-interest should take precedence over vague notions about moral duty when it comes to saving endangered species. In the final analysis, at a point when it becomes critical for our own survival as a species to save certain others, then we humans will do so if we are fit—in accordance with Darwin’s observed process of natural selection.
[G] The second argument has to do with capability. This argument disregards the extent to which we humans might have contributed to the endangerment of a species. Instead, the argument goes, if we are aware of the danger, know what steps are needed to prevent extinction, and can take those steps, then we are morally obligated to help prevent extinction. This argument would place a very high affirmative duty on humans to protect endangered species.
Order:
选项
答案
E
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/Mn1Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Individualsandbusinesseshavelegalprotectionforintellectualpropertytheycreateandown.Intellectualproper【C1】______fro
Individualsandbusinesseshavelegalprotectionforintellectualpropertytheycreateandown.Intellectualproper【C1】______fro
McDonald’s,Greggs,KFCandSubwayaretodaynamedasthemostlitteredbrandsinEnglandasKeepBritainTidycalledonfast-fo
Organisedvolunteeringandworkexperiencehaslongbeenavitalcompaniontouniversitydegreecourses.Usuallyitisleftto【C
Allaroundtheworld,lawyersgeneratemorehostilitythanthemembersofanyotherprofession—withthepossibleexceptionofjo
Bankershavebeenblamingthemselvesfortheirtroublesinpublic.Behindthescenes,theyhavebeentakingaimatsomeoneelse:
U.S.technologyworkersmaybelookingatabetterjobmarketinthecomingmonths,accordingtoanewstudyfromstaffingfirm
U.S.technologyworkersmaybelookingatabetterjobmarketinthecomingmonths,accordingtoanewstudyfromstaffingfirm
【F1】Breathingparticulate-laden(akasmoggy)airmaybehardeningyourarteriesfasterthannormal,accordingtoresearchpublishe
Duringthetraditionalweddingceremony,the【C1】______couplepromiseeachotherlifelongdevotion.Yet,aboutoneoutoffourAm
随机试题
散文名篇《长江三日》的作者是()
某高血压患者,65岁,发生广泛前壁急性心肌梗死3小时入院。下列各情况中提示该患者不能应用溶栓治疗的是
根据我国的法律规定,下列哪些情况可以形成法律关系并且是隶属型法律关系?()
下列关于招标采购的说法中,错误的是()。
良好的绝缘对于保证电气设备与线路的安全运行,防止人身触电事故的发生是最基本的和最可靠的手段,双重绝缘是强化的绝缘结构。下列关于双重绝缘的说法正确的是()。
对行政申请人隐瞒情况或提供虚假情况申请行政许可的,可能的处理有( )。
细胞因为发生了基因突变,出现不受控制地增殖分化,最终发展成为恶性肿瘤。在癌细胞表面存在着许多由突变基因编码的异常蛋白,按理说,这些异常蛋白应该被机体免疫系统及时识别,并引发免疫反应将癌细胞一举清除。然而,由于肿瘤细胞发展迅速、极善伪装,而且不断突变,面对凶
名词、动词、区别词都是实词。()
下列叙述中正确的是
A、Therighthand.B、Thelefthand.C、Bothhands.D、Itdepends.B原文提到,婴儿16周大时,主要使用左手进行触摸,因此B正确。
最新回复
(
0
)