首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2010-06-30
95
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specially, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most of ten assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
We can learn from Schwenk’s research that ________.
选项
A、a person’s view of conflict is influenced by the purpose of his organization
B、conflict is necessary for managers of for-profit organizations
C、different people resolve conflicts in different ways
D、it is impossible for people to avoid conflict
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/LTJd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
InthepasttwoyearsI’vephoned,e-mailedanddinedwiththreepotential"idealhusbands."(Thisisaccordingtotheauntsor
Whatroledomostpeopleinthemanufacturingtradesplay?
What’sthetopicofthepassage?
InthepasttwoyearsI’vephoned,e-mailedanddinedwiththreepotential"idealhusbands".(Thisisaccordingtotheauntsor
InthepasttwoyearsI’vephoned,e-mailedanddinedwiththreepotential"idealhusbands".(Thisisaccordingtotheauntsor
AccordingtotheFBI,howmanyrobberiesweresolvedbythepolicelastyearintermsofpercentage?
Imagineaworldinwhichtherewassuddenlynoemotion—aworldinwhichhumanbeingscouldfeelnoloveorhappiness,noterro
"Howareyoukeeping?""Look(31)______yourself.""GoodHealth.""Here’syourhealth.""Health,wealthandhappiness.""If
IfyouarebuyingapropertyinFrance,whetherforapermanentoraholidayhome,itisimportanttoopenaFrenchbankaccount
A、Sheranherownpublishinghouse.B、Shewroteherpoemsinherletters.C、Shewrotetonewspapersregularly.D、Sherecordedhe
随机试题
中国剪纸可分为南方派、江浙派、北方派。()
HelikesAnotonlytodiscussthingsBwithmebutalsoCaskingDformyadvice.
X线摄影条件选择的基本因素的叙述,错误的是
[2007年,第41题]石墨能够导电的原因,是由于石墨晶体()。
中国的抗日战争与同时期各国的反法西斯战争比较,其明显的不同是()。
领导权力的形式有()。
下列C++流的操作符中,能够设置浮点数精度的是
Animalshavebeenkeptaspetsbypeopleinallpartsoftheworldforthousandsofyears.Themost【C1】______petsaredogs,cats
Whoisthemanworkingwith?
ThedomesticeconomyintheUnitedStatesexpandedinaremarkablyvigorousandsteadyfashion.Therevivalinconsumerconfiden
最新回复
(
0
)