首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Informed public debate critical to future of genomic medicine Just mentioning "stem-cell research" or "genomic medicine" can
Informed public debate critical to future of genomic medicine Just mentioning "stem-cell research" or "genomic medicine" can
admin
2012-11-22
75
问题
Informed public debate critical to future of genomic medicine
Just mentioning "stem-cell research" or "genomic medicine" can open a floodgate of beliefs, concerns and, misinformation. Opinions are varied, mixed with fact and fiction, but one thing is clear: Open dialogue among researchers, teachers and the general public must continue as we struggle to define the relationship between our societal values and lifesciences research.
When the University of Washington .and the National Human Genome Research Institute hosted a community genetics forum last spring, questions abounded from the standing-room-only crowd about the implications of genetic research.
When is information about genetic health risks most helpful? Should genetic testing results be part of medical records and how would the results be used potentially by insurance companies? How can genetic testing benefit the criminal-justice system, such as establishings guilt or innocence using DNA testing,
The Human Genome Project will lead to amazing advances in medical science that will result in earlier diagnosis, more-targeted treatment, and a dramatic improvement in our ability to prevent terrible diseases. Genomic medicine will mean more personalized medicine tailored to the individual.
But these advances also carry inherent risks.
The obvious benefits of "personalized medicine" —use of genetic tests to guide preventive care and better drug prescribing—are counterbalanced by the possibility that such tests could lead to discrimination by insurers or employers. And, since genetic risk is often only one of the contributing factors to disease, overemphasis on personalized medicine could burden our health-care system with genetic tests of little or no benefit.
For example, smoking, diet and exercise play major roles in the risk of diabetes and heart disease. Identification of a genetic risk for these diseases can provide specific information for more-effective preventive care, but should not detract from pursuit of a healthy lifestyle.
The greatest health benefits of genomic research likely will come from insights into the basic biology of health and disease. This will ultimately lead to improved prevention and treatment—often without any need for genetic testing—for many diseases. The outcome from this research can be "precision medcine" —a morecost-effective approach to providing high-quality care. Thus, genomic medicine has the potential to improve the value of health care.
An example of the potential of genomic medicine to improve quality and reduce cost is the work of UW researchers Mark Rieder, Allan Rettie and Debbie Nickerson. They recently reported the discovery of a genetic method for accurately determining the proper dosage of a common blood-thinning drug, warfarin, which often produces adverse side effects because of its highly variable activity in patients.
Millions of people worldwide take worldwide to prevent stroke and blood clots, yet require expensive, constant testing from their physician to ensure proper dosage. These scientists’ findings illustrate how the powerful DNA analysis tools of the Human Genome Project are leading to a new era of tailoring drugs and therapies to an individual’s genome. Genomic medicine can lead to more-precise, personalized and cost- effective health care.
Medical advances always involve risk of harm, and genomic medicine is no exception. While technical issues require scientific research, we believe the challenges posed by genetic testing are far too critical to be left to the deliberation of scientists alone.
All members of society should have the opportunity to engage in collaborative discussion about the benefits and harms of genetic testing. Informed public discussion is vital to continue advances that hold so much promise for improving the value of health care.
Both educational resources and major organizational efforts will be needed to create opportunities for open discussion. But the most important resources are people’s time and their willingness to invest it in these discussions.
Researchers, teachers and the media have an obligation to create opportunities for sharing accurate, well-balanced information about potential uses of genomic technology.
Identification of a genetic risk for these diseases can provide specific information for more-effective preventive care.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
A
解析
从第七段第二句可知
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/J2w7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Forherstudy.B、Toordersomefilingcabinet.C、Tobuysomethingtodecorateherdormitoryroom.D、Tofindsometopicstodis
A、Somethingiswrongwithhercar.B、Thecostofthefuelishigh.C、It’scheaptotakebus.D、Shethinkspublictransportation
TheUnitedStatesgovernmentwantstoknowwhatthepublicthinksaboutitsfindingsonthesafetyof【36】animals.TheFooda
TheUnitedStatesgovernmentwantstoknowwhatthepublicthinksaboutitsfindingsonthesafetyof【36】animals.TheFooda
Iassumetheconstructionofthenewairport______attheendoflastyear.
Ifyouarealways______byuncertaintyindoinganything,you’llcometonothing.
Wagesforworkerinthepublic______oftheeconomydon’talwayskeepupwiththoseforworkerintheprivateones.
Theimportantinformationis______fromonecomputertoantherthroughatelephoneline.
A、Sometimestheyareunreliable.B、Obviouslytheyhavemadeamistake.C、Onthewholetheycanbetrusted.D、Generallyspeaking,
______(正是由于她太没有经验)thatshegotcheatedandlostmuchmoneyinthebusiness.
随机试题
取得直接关系公共利益的特定行业的市场准入行政许可的被许可人,应当按照国家规定的服务标准、资费标准和行政机关依法规定的条件,向用户提供安全、方便、稳定和价格合理的服务,并履行普遍服务的义务;未经作出行政许可决定的行政机关批准,不得擅自停业、歇业()
如果原水碱度过低,造成混凝不良,可加适量石灰或其他碱化剂提高碱度。
神经垂体分泌的激素主要有___________和催产素。
流行性乙型脑炎最具特征性的病变是
资金结构的合理化由多方面决定,主要有()。
下列各项中,不应计入销售费用的是()。
下列关于中国刑法适用范围的说法,哪个是正确的?()
癌症患者只要接受化疗,就会承受很强的副作用,而化疗的副作用会导致癌症患者抵抗力下降,因此,抵抗力下降的人容易患癌症。以下哪项与上文中的推理最接近?
以下说法中正确的是()。
Ifyouassociatewithsuchpeople.I’mafraidyou______serioustrouble.
最新回复
(
0
)