首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
96
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本题询问全文的主要内容。全文讲述了铁道案件及过去和现在人们对此类案件的态度和立场。因此只有D项较为全面准确地概括了全文的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/GQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
(1)"Britain’sbestexport,"IwastoldbytheheadoftheDepartmentofImmigrationinCanberra,"ispeople."Closeon100,000
FourreasonsthatrosyNovemberjobsreportwasevenbetterthanitseemed.It’simportantnottomaketoomuchoutofasingle
It’seasytoseewhythepriceofgasolineissoupsettingtosomanypeople.Gaspricesaretheoneeconomicindicatoryousee
A、Imposeandanswerquestionsduringclasstime.B、DomuchmorehomeworkthanBritishstudents.C、Betalkativeindiscussionses
Populationageingandtheresultingpressuresonexistingpensionsystemsconstitutesoneofthemostimportantchallengesmode
Unlikeanyothercreatureonthisplanet,humanscanlearnandunderstand,withouthavingexperienced.Theycanthinkthemselve
(1)Thepolicemanonthebeatmoveduptheavenueimpressively.Theimpressivenesswashabitualandnotforshow,forspectators
TVdatingshowsnowhavecausedmorecontroversiesthanpraises.Inappropriatestatementsofmaterialismareoftenputoutinth
Theopeningceremonyisagreatoccasion.Itisessential_______forthat.
Tedcouldn’tremembertheexactdateofthestorm,butheknewitwasSundaybecauseeverybodywasat______church.
随机试题
3岁患儿,高热10小时,伴头痛,频繁呕吐,腹泻3次为稀水样便。查体:T39℃,血压50/30mmHg.精神萎靡,全身散在大小不等瘀斑,心肺未见异常。脑脊液检查:细胞数15000×106/L,蛋白微量,葡萄糖2.2mmol/L。该患儿可能的诊断是
依据《严寒和寒冷地区居住建筑节能设计标准》,为满足建筑热工设计要求,严寒地区14层建筑物的体型系数宜()。(按新标准修订)
“进口口岸”栏应填“起运国(地区)”栏应填;
简述德育过程的规律。
简述米隆《掷铁饼者》的艺术特色。
下列与不作为犯罪相关的表述,哪一选项是正确的?()
“4+1”视图主要用于描述系统逻辑架构,最早PhilippeKruchten于1995年提出。其中(44)视图用于描述对象模型,并说明系统应该为用户提供哪些服务。当采用面向对象的设计方法描述对象模型时,通常使用(45)表达类的内部属性和行为,以及类集
一个虚拟存储系统由容量C1=8MB的主存和容量C2=800MB的辅存这两级存储器所构成。主存每位的平均代价P1=10个单位成本,辅存每位的平均代价P2=1个单位成本。相对CPU而言,从主存读出时间tA1=500ns,从辅存读出时间tA2=5ms。为了测定是
A、 B、 C、 C句子是询问哪个计划更合适的Which疑问句。一定要注意听Whichplan。
PassageFourWhatisthegenerallyacceptedstateofhighestperfectionforaruler?
最新回复
(
0
)