首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Choice blindness: You don’t know what you want We have all heard of experts who fail basic tests of sensory discrimination i
Choice blindness: You don’t know what you want We have all heard of experts who fail basic tests of sensory discrimination i
admin
2013-06-02
10
问题
Choice blindness: You don’t know what you want
We have all heard of experts who fail basic tests of sensory discrimination in their own field: wine snobs (自命不凡的人) who can’t tell red from white wine (though in blackened cups), or art critics who see deep meaning in random lines drawn by a computer. We delight in such stories since anyone claiming to be an authority is fair game. But what if we shine the spotlight on choices we make about everyday things? Experts might be forgiven for being wrong about the limits of their skills as experts, but could we be forgiven for being wrong about the limits of our skills as experts on ourselves?
We have been trying to answer this question using techniques from magic performances. Rather than playing tricks with alternatives presented to participants, we secretly altered the outcomes of their choices, and recorded how they react. For example, in an early study we showed our volunteers pairs of pictures of faces and asked them to choose the most attractive. In some trials, immediately after they made their choice, we asked people to explain the reasons behind their choices.
Unknown to them, we sometimes used a double-card magic trick to secretly exchange one face for the other so they ended up with the face they did not choose. Common sense dictates that all of us would notice such a big change in the outcome of a choice. But the result showed that in 75 per cent of the trials our participants were blind to the mismatch, even offering "reasons" for their "choice".
We called this effect "choice blindness", echoing change blindness, the phenomenon identified by psychologists where a remarkably large number of people fail to spot a major change in their environment. Recall the famous experiments where X asks Y for directions; while Y is struggling to help, X is switched for Z — and Y fails to notice. Researchers are still pondering the full implications, but it does show how little information we use in daily life, and undermines the idea that we know what is going on around us.
When we set out, we aimed to weigh in on the enduring, complicated debate about self-knowledge and intentionality. For all the intimate familiarity we feel we have with decisionmaking, it is very difficult to know about it from the "inside": one of the great barriers for scientific research is the nature of subjectivity.
As anyone who has ever been in a verbal disagreement can prove, people tend to give elaborate justifications for their decisions, which we have every reason to believe are nothing more than rationalisations (文过饰非) after me event. To prove such people wrong, though, or even provide enough evidence to change their mind, is an entirely different matter: who are you to say what my reasons are?
But with choice blindness we drive a large wedge between intentions and actions in the mind. As our participants give us verbal explanations about choices they never made, we can show them beyond doubt — and prove it — that what they say cannot be true. So our experiments offer a unique window into confabulation (虚构) (the story-telling we do to justify things after the fact) that is otherwise very difficult to come by. We can compare everyday explanations with those under lab conditions, looking for such things as the amount of detail in descriptions, how coherent the narrative is, the emotional tone, or even the timing or flow of the speech. Then we can create a theoretical framework to analyse any kind of exchange.
This framework could provide a clinical use for choice blindness: for example, two of our ongoing studies examine how malingering (装病) might develop into true symptoms, and how confabulation might play a role in obsessive-compulsive disorder (强迫症).
Importantly, the effects of choice blindness go beyond snap judgments. Depending on what our volunteers say in response to the mismatched outcomes of choices (whether they give short or long explanations, give numerical rating or labelling, and so on) we found this interaction could change their future preferences to the extent that they come to prefer the previously rejected alternative. This gives us a rare glimpse into the complicated dynamics of self-feedback ("I chose this, I publicly said so, therefore I must like it"), which we suspect lies behind the formation of many everyday preferences.
We also want to explore the boundaries of choice blindness. Of course, it will be limited by choices we know to be of great importance in everyday life. Which bride or bridegroom would fail to notice if someone switched their partner at the altar through amazing sleight of hand (巧妙的手 段)? Yet there is ample territory between the absurd idea of spouse-swapping, and the results of our early face experiments.
For example, in one recent study we invited supermarket customers to choose between two paired varieties of jam and tea. In order to switch each participant’s choice without them noticing, we created two sets of "magical" jars, with lids at both ends and a divider inside. The jars looked normal, but were designed to hold one variety of jam or tea at each end, and could easily be flipped over.
Immediately after the participants chose, we asked them to taste their choice again and tell us verbally why they made that choice. Before they did, we turned over the sample containers, so the tasters were given the opposite of what they had intended in their selection. Strikingly, people detected no more than a third of all these trick trials. Even when we switched such remarkably different flavors as spicy cinnamon and apple for bitter grapefruit jam, the participants spotted less than half of all switches.
We have also documented this kind of effect when we simulate online shopping for consumer products such as laptops or cellphones, and even apartments. Our latest tests are exploring moral and political decisions, a domain where reflection and deliberation are supposed to play a central role, but which we believe is perfectly suited to investigating using choice blindness.
Throughout our experiments, as well as registering whether our volunteers noticed that they had been presented with the alternative they did not choose, we also quizzed them about their beliefs about their decision processes. How did they think they would feel if they had been exposed to a study like ours? Did they think they would have noticed the switches? Consistently, between 80 and 90 per cent of people said that they believed they would have noticed something was wrong.
Imagine their surprise, even disbelief, when we told them about the nature of the experiments. In everyday decision-making we do see ourselves as knowing a lot about our selves, but like the wine buff or art critic, we often overstate what we know. The good news is that this form of decision snobbery should not be too difficult to treat. Indeed, after reading this article you might already be cured.
From the quiz researchers find that most people are quite confident about their feelings in the______.
选项
答案
decision processes
解析
空前的the表明,本空应填名词(短语)。该段首句后半部分提到,我们还会测试一下他们决策过程中的信心,末句提到测试结果:80%到90%的人说他们相信自己会注意到有些事情不对劲。题干中的most people是对between【C19】______and 90 per cent of people的概括总结,are quite confident about是对that they believed they would have noticed something was wrong 的概括总结,their feelings in与their beliefs about对应,故about后的decision processes即为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/ET67777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Intheirproperties.B、Intheircharacteristics.C、Intheirpeculiarity.D、Intheirrepresentativefunction.D在第二段的一开头,作者就提出了,
A、Thewomaniswell-preparedfortheexam.B、It’stoolatetostudyfortheexam.C、Onlyrecentclassmaterialwillbeontheex
AGuidetoJobHuntingDevelopingyourcareerandfindinganewjobcantakeoveryourlifeifyou’renotcareful.That’sw
MasstransportationrevisedthesocialandeconomicfabricoftheAmericancityinthreefundamentalways.Itspeededupphysica
A、Inacar.B、Inapoliceoffice.C、Inarestarant.D、Inarailwaystation.AW:Wheredoesthisroadlead?Wemustbelost.We’d
A、ManypeopleinNewYorksufferedfromtyphoidinthe1910s.B、MaryMallonchangedhernametoavoidspreadingtyphoid.C、Mary
A、inapolicestationB、bytheroadsideC、intheprisonD、inalawcourtD
SuggestionsforImprovingReadingSpeedImprovementofReadingRateItissafetosaythatalmostanyonecandoublehisorh
Manywriterscomplainthattheirbiggestdifficultyisfindingasubject.Sometimesthatdifficultyappearslesscomplicatedbec
Shetookataxitothestationforfearthatshe______(错过去目的地城市的火车).
随机试题
在内容和形式的矛盾运动中( )
关于婚前卫生咨询的描述,以下哪项是错误的
黄疸的生化检验指标是
为长期应用激素病人做口腔护理时,应注意观察
论人治与法治的区别并阐述法治的代价。
某企业准备投资一个完整工业建设项目,其资本成本为10%,分别有A、B、C三个方案可供选择。(1)A方案的有关资料如下:已知A方案的投资于建设期起点一次投入,建设期为1年,永续净现值为69671元。(2)B方案的项目寿命期为8年,包括建设期的静态回收
中国梦是强国梦、民族振兴梦,更是人民幸福梦。只有把国家富强、民族振兴的宏大主题落实到改善人民生活、提升幸福感等具体感知上,让人民群众有实实在在的获得感,国家才能拥有取之不尽的发展保障,民族才能拥有无比强大的力量。根据上述内容可以推出的是:
Whilestillinitsearlystages,welfarereformhasalreadybeenjudgedagreatsuccessinmanystatesatleastingettingpeopl
两台接连在同一个网段上的Windows 95计算机,ping不通,原因可能是(62); SNMP的设计是基于(63);在Windows 95下用资源管理器查看网络邻居时,系统提示网络无法访问,错误的原因是(64);对于一个使用应用代理服务型防火墙的网络而言
面向对象实现主要包括两项工作:把【】的结果,翻译成用某种程序语言书写的面向对象程序;测试并调试面向对象的程序。
最新回复
(
0
)