首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2012-01-19
92
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specially, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision-making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision-making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______.
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/D8xd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
WhenhediesinAprilof1983,Dr.JoelHildebrandwas101yearsold,whohadbeenmarriedforseventy-fiveyears,andhadtaugh
WhenhediesinAprilof1983,Dr.JoelHildebrandwas101yearsold,whohadbeenmarriedforseventy-fiveyears,andhadtaugh
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷漠)andstagnation(呆滞).
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷漠)andstagnation(呆滞).
【61】Itisawell-knownfactthatthereareconstantconflictsamongdifferentgroupsofpeople,andthatpeopletendtoblamet
Tobesuccessfulinajobinterview,youshouldtakecaretoappearmodestlydressed,avoidingtheextremesoftooelaborateor
Scientistsbelievethatpeople"dressedup"longbeforetheymadeahabitofwearingclothes.Primitivemandressedhimselfinf
Scientistsbelievethatpeople"dressedup"longbeforetheymadeahabitofwearingclothes.Primitivemandressedhimselfinf
WhatisSaffoaccordingtohimself?
随机试题
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherinthelaboratorywouldsubmittheresultsoftheirres
男,40岁。左下第一恒磨牙全冠粘固3天后出现疼痛。其可能的原因,除外
可引起先天性婴儿畸形的常见病毒是
在安全预评价的程序中,准备阶段的主要工作有()。
下列不能单独作为认定案件事实的依据有()。
中国公民张先生为国内某企业高级技术员工。2019年度取得的收入如下:(1)每月取得工资收入7200元。(2)6月参加某商场有奖组织的有奖销售活动,中奖所得共计20000元,其中将10000元通过教育部门捐赠给当地的教育事业。(
“报告”适用于()。
有如下程序:#includeusingnamespacestd;classAA{intk;protected:intn;voidsetK(intk)
近日,国务院公布了《关于促进旅游业改革发展的若干意见》,鼓励职工______个人需要和工作实际分段灵活安排带薪年休假。将带薪年休假制度落实情况纳人各地政府议事______,作为劳动监察和职工______保障的重要内容,“高等学校可结合实际调整寒、暑假时间,
Whydoadultsbelievethatalcoholicawarenessprogramsteachyoungpeoplenottooverdrink?Recently,readinganarticleabout
最新回复
(
0
)